Skip to content

Defining new action for python wrapper wheels #161

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 7, 2025

Conversation

tmi
Copy link
Collaborator

@tmi tmi commented Feb 6, 2025

The common logic behind the python wrapper wheel publishing

Demonstration of "success": https://github.com/ecmwf/eckit/actions/runs/13182965534/job/36798126868 -- it actually failed because the wheels already exist (or because of the compile error thats to be fixed elsewhere). But it executed what it should have execute, so all good from the local pov

I have a single parameter because the validation wasn't passing otherwise -- but so far we don't need any parametrization

@FussyDuck
Copy link

FussyDuck commented Feb 6, 2025

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@tmi tmi force-pushed the action/pythonWrapperWheel branch from 30943fa to 6081ff5 Compare February 6, 2025 16:05
@tmi tmi force-pushed the action/pythonWrapperWheel branch from 6081ff5 to 31e17cc Compare February 6, 2025 16:06
@tmi tmi marked this pull request as ready for review February 6, 2025 16:14
# we'd ideally not reexecute the compile step multiple times, but it
# (non-essentially) depends on a matrix-based step. Add more pythons, possibly
# more manylinuxes
python_version: ["3.11", "3.13"]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd add more Pythons from the start (3.9 to 3.13) because it will be a pain to add them later if we've already uploaded wheels for some Python versions and not others (I know from experience!)

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sure, I just didn't want the initial test to run that long :), I'll update pre-merge. Also, note each entry in the matrix still requires the full compilation (redundantly...)

Copy link
Contributor

@iainrussell iainrussell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tmi - I'm happy with this - are you ready for me to merge it in?

@tmi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tmi commented Feb 7, 2025

@iainrussell yes, happy with this being merged

@iainrussell iainrussell merged commit 83d623c into main Feb 7, 2025
10 of 11 checks passed
@iainrussell iainrussell deleted the action/pythonWrapperWheel branch February 7, 2025 13:20
@iainrussell
Copy link
Contributor

Merged, and it now has the v2 tag 🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants