process: document quality management process according to template structure #835

PandaeDo · 2025-04-01T09:32:14Z

Ref: closes #316

github-actions · 2025-04-01T09:32:59Z

License Check Results

🚀 The license check job ran with the Bazel command:

bazel run //:license-check

Status: ✅ Passed

Click to expand output

[License Check Output]
Extracting Bazel installation...
Starting local Bazel server and connecting to it...
INFO: Invocation ID: d15ef027-e93d-4fe2-82dc-83b76f5d1ba7
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Loading: 
Loading: 0 packages loaded
Analyzing: target //:license-check (1 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)
Analyzing: target //:license-check (1 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (92 packages loaded, 10 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (125 packages loaded, 543 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (133 packages loaded, 1620 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (144 packages loaded, 1966 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (145 packages loaded, 2465 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (146 packages loaded, 2589 targets configured)

INFO: Analyzed target //:license-check (150 packages loaded, 4737 targets configured).
[8 / 13] Creating runfiles tree bazel-out/k8-opt-exec-ST-d57f47055a04/bin/external/score_dash_license_checker~/tool/formatters/dash_format_converter.runfiles [for tool]; 0s local ... (2 actions, 1 running)
INFO: Found 1 target...
Target //:license.check.license_check up-to-date:
  bazel-bin/license.check.license_check
  bazel-bin/license.check.license_check.jar
INFO: Elapsed time: 20.006s, Critical Path: 0.43s
INFO: 13 processes: 4 disk cache hit, 9 internal.
INFO: Build completed successfully, 13 total actions
INFO: Running command line: bazel-bin/license.check.license_check ./formatted.txt -review -project automotive.score -repo https://github.com/eclipse-score/score -token otyhZ4eaRYK1tKLNNF-Y
[main] INFO Querying Eclipse Foundation for license data for 76 items.
[main] INFO Found 52 items.
[main] INFO Querying ClearlyDefined for license data for 24 items.
[main] INFO Found 24 items.
[main] INFO Vetted license information was found for all content. No further investigation is required.

github-actions · 2025-04-02T06:21:03Z

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

masc2023

Propose to have dedicated working meeting to address the major topics and relations to other process areas

docs/process/process_areas/index.rst

docs/process/process_areas/quality_management/quality_concept.rst

docs/platform_management_plan/quality_management.rst

Ref: closes eclipse-score#316

masc2023

May update also Process Area Image and color the Quality Management with yellow

masc2023 · 2025-05-09T10:48:57Z

docs/process/process_areas/quality_management/quality_workflow.rst

+Workflows
+---------
+
+todo: need to add guidance and standard links


Shall this todo stay?

masc2023 · 2025-05-09T10:50:55Z

docs/process/process_areas/quality_management/quality_workflow.rst

+   :responsible: rl__quality_manager
+   :approved_by: rl__technical_lead
+   :supported_by:
+   :input: wp__policies, wp__issue_track_system


may add as input, wp__platform_mgmt, compare Create/Maintain Safety Plan

masc2023 · 2025-05-09T10:55:22Z

docs/process/process_areas/quality_management/quality_workflow.rst

+   :responsible: rl__quality_manager
+   :approved_by: rl__technical_lead
+   :supported_by: rl__committer
+   :input: wp__qms_plan, wp__process_definition


Shall we not add here your overview table as input

masc2023 · 2025-05-09T10:57:50Z

docs/process/process_areas/quality_management/quality_workproducts.rst

+Workproducts
+############
+
+.. workproduct:: Quality Management Plan


BPs should not be mapped to WOs, only IIC, BPs should be mapped to Guidances only, compare Meta Model

masc2023 · 2025-05-09T11:00:53Z

docs/process/process_areas/quality_management/quality_getstrt.rst

+General Workflow
+****************
+
+.. figure:: _assets/quality_workflow.drawio.svg


Are the numbers in the figure used/referenced somewhere?

masc2023 · 2025-05-09T11:16:23Z

docs/platform_management_plan/quality_management.rst

+This includes an approach to providing an independent and objective assurance that work products and processes
+comply with predefined provisions and plans and that non-conformances are resolved and further prevented.
+This document includes quality assurance activities, roles and responsibilities, goals, schedule, etc. and a
+general strategy to implement quality assurance process in this platform. The quality assurance is


implement "a" quality assurance process

masc2023 · 2025-05-09T11:18:08Z

docs/platform_management_plan/quality_management.rst

+
+The :need:`rl__quality_manager` provides only support to the project with consulting them to improve the
+quality of the project/platform product. Although the quality report is also sent to the :need:`rl__technical_lead`,
+the :need:`rl__quality_manager` is independent of the delivery of the product.


I do not fully understand the content of this sentence, may reforumlate it

masc2023 · 2025-05-09T11:21:17Z

docs/platform_management_plan/quality_management.rst

+        | All tool requirements have bidirectional traceability to and from process requirements or guidance
+      - 100%
+      - None
+      - Ensured by process configuration and tool management, only valid requirements can be merged, review required, script based check


Metric may here not correct, this wp is not a requirement, found also other wps, where the metric is not correct and should be

masc2023 · 2025-05-09T11:22:07Z

docs/platform_management_plan/quality_management.rst

+      - | All requirements were inspected by review with inspection checklist.
+      - 100%
+      - None
+      - Ensured by process configuration and tool management, only valid requirements can be merged, review required, script based check


check metric

masc2023 · 2025-05-09T11:28:37Z

docs/platform_management_plan/quality_management.rst

+
+The project roles are defined in the processes and are aligned to Eclipse roles.
+
+.. needtable::


here only the roles for quality management should appear, not all, that should be part of project management plan, or not?

Replace in-score starpls tool with the one from tooling repo. Signed-off-by: Nicolae Dicu <[email protected]>

Correct term is now Change Request with types Feature request, modification, et. Resolves: eclipse-score#1039

- Arrange elements in a grid - Fix a few typos - Disable dark-mode as the diagram looks bad in this mode

Ref: closes eclipse-score#317 Signed-off-by: aschemmel-tech <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: aschemmel-tech <[email protected]>

Ref: closes eclipse-score#538 Signed-off-by: aschemmel-tech <[email protected]>

Stakeholder, Risk Management

…-score#1064)

Ref: closes eclipse-score#313 Signed-off-by: aschemmel-tech <[email protected]>

closes: none

Rename cross-functional teams to feature teams and update the links.

Resolves: eclipse-score/process_description#12

Initial draft

Update of draft document

Signed-off-by: Sven Bachmann <[email protected]>

International Requirements Engineering Board (IREB) Signed-off-by: Sven Bachmann <[email protected]>

These requirements are not needed at a feature level. Signed-off-by: Sven Bachmann <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Sven Bachmann <[email protected]>

Ref: closes#316

PandaeDo force-pushed the vohae_quality_management branch from f1c0343 to e9a441b Compare April 2, 2025 06:18

PandaeDo requested a review from masc2023 April 2, 2025 06:49

masc2023 requested changes Apr 2, 2025

View reviewed changes

process: include review findings

ba662f0

Ref: closes eclipse-score#316

PandaeDo force-pushed the vohae_quality_management branch from e9a441b to ba662f0 Compare May 9, 2025 10:02

PandaeDo requested a review from masc2023 May 9, 2025 10:27

masc2023 requested changes May 9, 2025

View reviewed changes

nicu1989 and others added 21 commits May 22, 2025 20:45

tooling: Add starpls from tooling (eclipse-score#1037)

bde67ee

Replace in-score starpls tool with the one from tooling repo. Signed-off-by: Nicolae Dicu <[email protected]>

process: remove term contribution request

41dd011

Correct term is now Change Request with types Feature request, modification, et. Resolves: eclipse-score#1039

docs: Clean up S-CORE 1.0 architecture diagram

35da731

- Arrange elements in a grid - Fix a few typos - Disable dark-mode as the diagram looks bad in this mode

docs: typos correction in doc mgt process

cce5978

Ref: closes eclipse-score#317 Signed-off-by: aschemmel-tech <[email protected]>

feo feature request formal corrections

dd0105a

Signed-off-by: aschemmel-tech <[email protected]>

docs: update config_management with links

c02527e

Ref: closes eclipse-score#538 Signed-off-by: aschemmel-tech <[email protected]>

switch to central docs-as-code tooling (eclipse-score#1052)

e8b3149

bugfix: remove irrelevant plans from pmp

b3a4373

Stakeholder, Risk Management

chore: update score_docs_as_code dependency version to 0.2.0 (eclipse…

bf6b130

…-score#1064)

docs: release process small bugfixes

d08d4bf

Ref: closes eclipse-score#313 Signed-off-by: aschemmel-tech <[email protected]>

make commit message rules user friendlier (eclipse-score#1043)

50bedc4

publish needs.json (eclipse-score#1066)

ea3cec0

Adding rationale for fixed assignment of activities to threads.

26814e8

closes: none

docs: rename cft to ft

b0f8776

Rename cross-functional teams to feature teams and update the links.

docs: add need to identify git coding guidelines as document

ba83d1a

Resolves: eclipse-score/process_description#12

persistency: Feature request for KVS

4ee887f

Initial draft

persistency: Feature request for KVS

77ce4c3

Update of draft document

persistency_kvs: refined feature requirements

c8cedeb

Signed-off-by: Sven Bachmann <[email protected]>

persistency_kvs: refined req wording to match IREB standards

f649b80

International Requirements Engineering Board (IREB) Signed-off-by: Sven Bachmann <[email protected]>

persistency_kvs: removed reqs after review from Vinod

3d1954c

These requirements are not needed at a feature level. Signed-off-by: Sven Bachmann <[email protected]>

persistency_kvs: run spell checker

3eb2f8b

Signed-off-by: Sven Bachmann <[email protected]>

sbachmann-qorix and others added 3 commits May 22, 2025 20:45

persistency_kvs: integrated FT review from 2025-05-15

d76ef93

Signed-off-by: Sven Bachmann <[email protected]>

process: update drawing process overview

421cf34

process: include all review findings

c46d90a

Ref: closes#316


		The project roles are defined in the processes and are aligned to Eclipse roles.

		.. needtable::

process: document quality management process according to template structure #835

Are you sure you want to change the base?

process: document quality management process according to template structure #835

Uh oh!

Conversation

PandaeDo commented Apr 1, 2025

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Apr 1, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

License Check Results

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Apr 2, 2025

Uh oh!

masc2023 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

masc2023 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Apr 1, 2025 •

edited

Loading