Skip to content

[10384] Adding Zero Copy feature to the Latency performance tests #1742

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Feb 19, 2021

Conversation

MiguelBarro
Copy link
Contributor

This PR should be merged after PR #1706, #1730 and #1705.

@MiguelBarro MiguelBarro added no-test Skip CI tests if PR marked with this label skip-ci Automatically pass CI labels Feb 5, 2021
@MiguelBarro MiguelBarro changed the title Adding Zero Copy feature to the Latency performance tests [10507] Adding Zero Copy feature to the Latency performance tests Feb 5, 2021
@richiware
Copy link
Member

Build status:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Linux aarch64Build Status
  • Mac Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@MiguelBarro MiguelBarro force-pushed the feature/performance_latency_zero_copy branch from da5d556 to b2d87e4 Compare February 8, 2021 10:36
Copy link
Contributor

@IkerLuengo IkerLuengo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I know we have discussed it already, and we all though it was a good solution, but how fair is to discard the echo bounce time in the measurements? Isn't that part of the 'consequences' of using, for example, the loan API? If having to wait for a loan makes our overall latency worse, should we assume it on the measurements?

IkerLuengo
IkerLuengo previously approved these changes Feb 9, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@IkerLuengo IkerLuengo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

IkerLuengo
IkerLuengo previously approved these changes Feb 9, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@IkerLuengo IkerLuengo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@EduPonz EduPonz removed no-test Skip CI tests if PR marked with this label skip-ci Automatically pass CI labels Feb 10, 2021
Copy link

@EduPonz EduPonz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the not dynamic case, the CSV and STDOUT tables show and incorrect size for bytes larger than what the user requested (68 instead of 64). I have not tested with dynamic data though

@richiprosima
Copy link
Contributor

Build status:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Linux aarch64Build Status
  • Mac Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@MiguelBarro MiguelBarro changed the title [10507] Adding Zero Copy feature to the Latency performance tests [10384] Adding Zero Copy feature to the Latency performance tests Feb 15, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@IkerLuengo IkerLuengo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany merged commit 8ff9e0d into master Feb 19, 2021
@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany deleted the feature/performance_latency_zero_copy branch February 19, 2021 07:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants