Skip to content

Merge 3.10.x up into 4.3.x #6809

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Feb 25, 2025
Merged

Merge 3.10.x up into 4.3.x #6809

merged 8 commits into from
Feb 25, 2025

Conversation

greg0ire
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

derrabus and others added 8 commits January 6, 2025 17:56
* 3.9.x:
  PHPStan 2.1.1 (doctrine#6690)
  PHPUnit 9.6.22 (doctrine#6691)
  Bump doctrine/.github from 6.0.0 to 7.1.0 (doctrine#6649)
  Bump doctrine/.github from 5.3.0 to 6.0.0 (doctrine#6642)
* 3.9.x:
  bugfix: deallocate mysqli prepared statement (doctrine#6681)
|      Q       |   A
|------------- | -----------
| Type         | improvement
| Fixed issues | N/A

#### Summary

We'd like to flag the the doctrine/cache package as abandoned which
means it needs to disappear from the list of mandatory dependencies of
DBAL. In DBAL 3.9, the doctrine/cache classes are used for deprecated
code paths only.

Note: This change could break downstream projects if they rely on DBAL
installing the Cache package for them.
@greg0ire greg0ire marked this pull request as draft February 24, 2025 21:51
- "pdo_sqlite"
include:
- os: "ubuntu-20.04"
php-version: "8.1"
dependencies: "lowest"
extension: "pdo_sqlite"
- os: "ubuntu-22.04"
php-version: "8.1"
php-version: "8.4"
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Both conflicts in this file emanate from #6740

I'm not sure if this is the right conflict resolution or if I should stick with 8.1 here.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think 8.4 is the right choice as #6740 made this change. IIRC, I resoved it the same when I merged it to 4.2.x.

Copy link
Member

@SenseException SenseException left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I assume this was supposed to be ready for review based on the PR's comments

@morozov
Copy link
Member

morozov commented Feb 25, 2025

I assume this was supposed to be ready for review based on the PR's comments

I think Grégoire will push it directely, since there's already a merge commit. Hence the draft status.

@greg0ire greg0ire merged commit 320df7e into doctrine:4.3.x Feb 25, 2025
65 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants