-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
Fixed various typos #5716
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed various typos #5716
Conversation
@greg0ire Not sure if you get notified on new pushes, so just added the backwards-compatible function |
I do get notified. |
You can run |
Thanks for all your help! |
I've done it for you, and also, I fixed up the backwards-compat layer commit into the right commit. 👍 |
Oh wow, thank you so much! |
@@ -186,11 +186,19 @@ public function spansColumns(array $columnNames) | |||
} | |||
|
|||
/** | |||
* Checks if the other index already fulfills all the indexing and constraint needs of the current one. | |||
* Keeping misspelled function name for backwards compatibility |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Although we need to keep the method around in the current major release, it should be deprecated and removed in the next major.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep, @greg0ire already mentioned that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@morozov I think this can be merged as is, then the deprecation can be added on 3.5.x
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@nexxai please don't mark as resolved conversations you do not open in general, and here in particular because it hides my comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh no, I'm sorry! I'll leave them open for the commenter to close. Again, my apologies.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No worries.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#5716 (comment) doesn't seem to be addressed. The method needs to be annotated as deprecated, and a note in UPGRADE.md
added.
@morozov have you seen my comment on this? |
No, I missed that one. |
Confirmed: I've subscribed to #5720 and will send the appropriate PR to 3.5.x when it's been merged. Thanks for both of your help and understanding through this process. |
Summary
Cleaning up typos throughout the codebase