chore: OSS -> EE mass migration

[eecsliu]

Description

Before merging EE and OSS, we must bring both migrations to parity. The up migration in this PR contain all the migrations that OSS is missing while remaining a no-op for EE databases. In addition, we are adding all the down migrations corresponding with the ones included in the up migration, just in case someone wants to do a down migration.

Test Plan

Make sure CI is running fine.
To manually test, remove oss-to-ee-catch-up.tx.up.sql from the migrations directory and run devcluster with a clean database. Then add the file back and restart devcluster master. This should succeed. Next, switch to EE version and run devcluster (without removing the database). The upgrade from OSS to EE should be seamless.

Commentary (optional)

Checklist

• Changes have been manually QA'd
• User-facing API changes need the "User-facing API Change" label.
• Release notes should be added as a separate file under docs/release-notes/.
  See Release Note for details.
• Licenses should be included for new code which was copied and/or modified from any external code.

Ticket

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for determined-ui ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	0f8caff
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/determined-ui/deploys/661434674ad1040008bcf993
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-9086--determined-ui.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 46.17%. Comparing base (cf2f2be) to head (c49d7a1).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

❗ Current head c49d7a1 differs from pull request most recent head 0f8caff. Consider uploading reports for the commit 0f8caff to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #9086   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   46.16%   46.17%           
=======================================
  Files        1174     1174           
  Lines      145186   145186           
  Branches     2413     2413           
=======================================
+ Hits        67026    67035    +9     
+ Misses      77952    77943    -9     
  Partials      208      208           

Flag	Coverage Δ
backend	43.51% <ø> (+0.02%)	⬆️
harness	64.00% <ø> (ø)
web	36.82% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 5 files with indirect coverage changes

[djanicekpach]

Seems fine from infra review perspective. This seems like the type of change where testing will be the best way to find problems and it looks like that happened.