-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
chore(std): Remove tsconfig_test.json #8629
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
docs/getting_started/typescript.md
Outdated
value) or removed (in case `Foo` is strictly a type) in the output JS. So Deno | ||
_without_ `--no-check` requires that all TS complies with | ||
[`isolatedModules`](https://www.typescriptlang.org/tsconfig#isolatedModules) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think isolatedModules
is required even with type checking?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think
isolatedModules
is required even with type checking?
Yes I wrote "without --no-check
". In fact it's only required with type checking, but that makes it --no-check
compatible.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@nayeemrmn I see; I'm concerned about wording here - it suggests that isolatedModules
is required only in a specific scenario while in fact it's always required.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reworded.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The whole TypeScript section needs to be re-written. It is on my back burner under #8139. I think what is there could be a bit confusing, but is accurate and sufficient for the time being.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Missed in #8050. Also updates doc surrounding
isolatedModules
and--no-check
.