style: extend no-explicit-dtype check to xp and jnp

[njzjz]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Expanded the DPChecker to recognize additional libraries ("xp" and "jnp") for enhanced validation of function calls.

• Bug Fixes

  • Improved compatibility of the offset calculation in the xp_take_along_axis function to ensure it matches the data type of the indices array.

[njzjz]

deepmd/dpmodel/array_api.py:64:14: E8002: No explicit dtype. (no-explicit-dtype)

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to two files: deepmd/dpmodel/array_api.py and source/checker/deepmd_checker.py. In array_api.py, the xp_take_along_axis function was updated to ensure the offset variable's data type matches that of the indices array. In deepmd_checker.py, the DPChecker class was enhanced to recognize additional libraries ("xp" and "jnp") in its visit_call method, broadening its validation scope while retaining existing error handling logic.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
deepmd/dpmodel/array_api.py	Modified xp_take_along_axis to match offset data type with indices type.
source/checker/deepmd_checker.py	Expanded DPChecker to recognize "xp" and "jnp" in visit_call method for library validation.

Possibly related PRs

• style: enable TorchFix in pre-commit #4230: The changes in the main PR involve the xp_take_along_axis function, which may be relevant to the TorchFix tool's focus on code fixes related to PyTorch, particularly in ensuring compatibility with tensor operations.

Suggested reviewers

• iProzd
• wanghan-iapcm

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0fa1b43 and 993b41d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• deepmd/dpmodel/array_api.py (1 hunks)
• source/checker/deepmd_checker.py (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🔇 Additional comments (1)

source/checker/deepmd_checker.py (1)

40-40: LGTM! The changes correctly extend dtype checking.

The addition of "xp" and "jnp" to the set of checked libraries properly implements the PR objective of extending the no-explicit-dtype check. The implementation maintains consistency with the existing error handling logic while broadening the validation scope.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.57%. Comparing base (b4701da) to head (542e207).
Report is 184 commits behind head on devel.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #4247      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   84.55%   84.57%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         537      547      +10     
  Lines       51237    51334      +97     
  Branches     3047     3051       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits        43324    43416      +92     
- Misses       6965     6968       +3     
- Partials      948      950       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.