Skip to content

Autogenerated sequences for PRIMARY KEY values #185

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 21 commits into from
Apr 16, 2025

Conversation

hlcianfagna
Copy link
Contributor

@hlcianfagna hlcianfagna commented Mar 21, 2025

About

Adding a new section about:

  • Autogenerated sequences and PRIMARY KEY values in CrateDB

Preview

@hlcianfagna hlcianfagna marked this pull request as ready for review March 21, 2025 16:08
@hlcianfagna hlcianfagna requested review from hammerhead and amotl March 21, 2025 16:08
Copy link
Member

@amotl amotl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi. I didn't review the text in detail yet (will do as we go), but I love so much that there will be a dedicated guiding page about that topic now.

Because the topic is not necessarily about performance matters, but more about functional details, do you see a chance to slot it in differently, or are you open to any proposals of ours?

@amotl amotl changed the title Add content about generating IDs automatically Autogenerated sequences for PRIMARY KEY values Mar 21, 2025
Copy link
Member

@amotl amotl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you again. 👍

  • I've added a few suggestions, many of them just formatting nitpicks. Feel free to take or reject each item at your disposal. 🙏
  • I've reviewed most of the prose, i.e. no SQL, and also omitted the preamble up until now, focusing on the main body of the document.

Comment on lines 157 to 159
).all()
)
!= "[]"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There might be a .count() method, or possibly even an empty() method?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I really looked for an alternative but could not find it. There would be plenty of options giving up on the records library but I like that it makes the rest of the code so simple.

Copy link
Member

@amotl amotl Apr 15, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. It certainly should not block the merge. Because I love that you also like the records library, I may check this spot on a subsequent iteration to possibly find a better way to compare for result emptyness?

Why not just do it this way, if it's semantically correct that you want to break if the result is not empty?

result = db.query(....)
if result:
    break

@amotl amotl requested a review from kneth March 21, 2025 20:27
@hlcianfagna
Copy link
Contributor Author

Because the topic is not necessarily about performance matters, but more about functional details, do you see a chance to slot it in differently, or are you open to any proposals of ours?

I thought about it, but did not see any obvious place where it would fit naturally, I am happy to move it if you have any location in mind.

@amotl
Copy link
Member

amotl commented Mar 24, 2025

Do you see a chance to slot it in differently?

I thought about it, but did not see any obvious place where it would fit naturally.

I agree. There is no other proper section yet that would fit the bill here. Maybe we will repurpose the performance section in the future to accompany both performance and usability/convenience aspects?

Please go ahead slotting it in here, and let's have a quick conversation how to evolve this area of the documentation this or next week?

Copy link

@kneth kneth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!!

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 15, 2025

Walkthrough

A new documentation section has been introduced to the insert performance guide, focusing on strategies for generating primary key values in CrateDB. The table of contents for the insert performance guide has been updated to include a new entry for "sequences." A dedicated document explains various approaches to primary key generation, including the use of timestamps, UUIDs, external IDs, and custom sequence tables with optimistic concurrency control, complete with SQL and Python examples.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
docs/performance/inserts/index.rst Added "sequences" to the table of contents for the insert performance guide.
docs/performance/inserts/sequences.rst Introduced a new documentation file detailing primary key generation strategies in CrateDB, with examples.

Poem

In the warren of docs, a new path appears,
For keys and for rows, to calm all your fears.
Sequences, UUIDs, and timestamps galore,
Now explained simply—no need to implore!
With Python and SQL, the journey is sweet,
Hop along, dear reader—your inserts complete!
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 03b9eac and 69382de.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/performance/inserts/sequences.rst (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • docs/performance/inserts/sequences.rst
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Build docs on macos-latest
  • GitHub Check: Build docs on ubuntu-latest

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
docs/performance/inserts/sequences.rst (3)

30-34: Consider using Sphinx field lists for pros/cons formatting.

For improved readability and consistency with Sphinx/reStructuredText conventions, you may use field lists (e.g., :Pros: and :Cons:) instead of bolded headings for pros and cons. This is optional but can enhance the rendered output.


49-50: Mention lack of range query support for UUIDs.

It may be helpful to explicitly state that UUIDs do not support efficient range queries, which is a key limitation compared to sequential numeric IDs. This is especially relevant for users considering query patterns.


131-162: Consider adding a timeout or maximum retry count to the optimistic update loop.

The current retry loop for optimistic concurrency could potentially spin indefinitely if there is persistent contention or an error. Adding a timeout or maximum retry count would make the example more robust and production-friendly.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1b5507c and d6608ff.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/performance/inserts/index.rst (1 hunks)
  • docs/performance/inserts/sequences.rst (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Build docs on macos-latest
  • GitHub Check: Build docs on ubuntu-latest
🔇 Additional comments (4)
docs/performance/inserts/index.rst (1)

33-33: Addition of "sequences" to the table of contents is clear and consistent.

The new entry integrates well with the existing structure and improves discoverability of the new documentation.

docs/performance/inserts/sequences.rst (3)

73-73: Good use of external reference for data replication scenario.

The link to the Debezium and Kafka blog post provides valuable context for users ingesting data from external systems.


81-83: Clear explanation of manual sequence implementation.

The description of the manual sequence approach is concise and accurate, highlighting both the technical requirements and the concurrency considerations.


126-167: Python code example is clear and demonstrates the optimistic concurrency pattern well.

The code is practical and easy to follow. Consider referencing PEP 723 for inline dependency specification in future examples, as suggested in past reviews, but this is not required here.

Copy link
Member

@amotl amotl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving, thanks again! My suggestions for a later iteration are:

  • Relocate the document into the future "Data Modeling" subsection, like planned with @kneth.
  • Convert to Markdown.
  • More sanding.

NB: Let me know if you need support about technicalities, for example wrestling with reStructuredText, in order to bring in this patch.

@amotl
Copy link
Member

amotl commented Apr 15, 2025

@coderabbitai: In your comment above, you said:

It may be helpful to explicitly state that UUIDs do not support efficient range queries, which is a key limitation compared to sequential numeric IDs. This is especially relevant for users considering query patterns.

However, here we are using the UUIDv7 variant, which indeed supports efficient range queries, because subsequently generated tokens are sequential like numeric IDs.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 15, 2025

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

The file docs/performance/inserts/sequences.rst doesn't exist in the repository. Let me try to find it first:

Let me check what files are available in the repository:

Let me try to get more information about the PR to see the exact files being changed:

@amotl You're absolutely right, and thank you for the correction. UUIDv7 is indeed designed to be time-ordered and sequential, which makes it efficient for range queries, unlike earlier UUID versions such as UUIDv4.

The time-based ordering in UUIDv7 creates sequential values that can be efficiently indexed and queried by range, similar to numeric IDs. I apologize for the inaccuracy in my previous comment. This is an important distinction that makes UUIDv7 particularly valuable for distributed database systems like CrateDB.

(_/)
(•ᴗ•)
/ >📝


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the content of the sequences.rst file
cat docs/performance/inserts/sequences.rst

Length of output: 6274


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Find the sequences.rst file
find . -name "sequences.rst"

Length of output: 69


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# List files in the repository
ls -la docs/performance/inserts/ 2>/dev/null || echo "Directory not found"

Length of output: 579


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Get information about the PR
gh pr view 185 --json files

Length of output: 195


🌐 Web query:

UUIDv7 time ordered sequential support for range queries

💡 Result:

UUIDv7 is designed to provide time-ordered sequential support, which is particularly beneficial for database operations, including range queries. Here are some key aspects of UUIDv7's support for range queries:

Key Features of UUIDv7

  • Time-Based Structure: UUIDv7 incorporates a timestamp in its most significant bits, ensuring that newer IDs are greater than older ones. This makes them naturally sorted in time order, which is similar to UUIDv1 but with better privacy features as it doesn't use MAC addresses[1][2][4].

  • Efficient Indexing: The time-ordered nature of UUIDv7 helps maintain better locality in database indexes, especially B-tree indexes. This leads to improved performance for both insertions and range queries, as data inserted at similar times is clustered together[1][6][8].

  • Range Queries: The sequential and time-ordered nature of UUIDv7 facilitates efficient range queries. By leveraging the timestamp within the UUID, databases can execute range queries more efficiently without needing additional timestamp columns[8][9].

Benefits for Range Queries

  • Improved Performance: UUIDv7's time-based ordering reduces the need for additional timestamp columns to perform efficient time-based queries. This simplifies query logic and enhances query performance, especially in distributed systems handling large amounts of data[8].

  • Better Index Fragmentation: Unlike random UUIDs like UUIDv4, UUIDv7 minimizes index fragmentation because new inserts are more likely to occur in sequence, reducing the need for index rebalancing[6][8].

Implementation and Use Cases

  • Database Partitioning: UUIDv7 is particularly useful for time-based partitioning in databases. It allows for efficient data organization by time, making it easier to manage and query data within specific time ranges[9].

  • Support Across Systems: Although not universally supported as of yet, UUIDv7 can be implemented in various systems using custom extensions or libraries. For example, PostgreSQL can use Trusted Language Extensions to support UUIDv7[7].

Overall, UUIDv7 provides a robust solution for systems requiring efficient range queries and time-based indexing, offering significant performance advantages over random UUID versions.

Citations:


@amotl You're absolutely right, and I apologize for my mistake. Looking at the sequences.rst documentation and researching further, UUIDv7 is specifically designed to be time-ordered and sequential, which does indeed support efficient range queries.

The documentation correctly states this under the UUIDv7 section's pros: "almost sequential, which enables range queries." UUIDv7 incorporates timestamps in its most significant bits, ensuring that IDs are naturally sorted chronologically, unlike random UUIDs such as UUIDv4.

Thank you for the correction - this is an important distinction that makes UUIDv7 particularly valuable in distributed database systems like CrateDB where both uniqueness and query performance matter.

(_/)
(•ᴗ•)
/ >📝

✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: amotl
URL: https://github.com/crate/cratedb-guide/pull/185

Timestamp: 2025-04-15T22:20:30.700Z
Learning: UUIDv7 (UUID version 7) supports efficient range queries because it generates time-ordered sequential values, unlike earlier random UUID versions. This makes UUIDv7 particularly useful for primary keys in distributed database systems like CrateDB where both uniqueness and range query performance are important.

Learnt from: amotl
URL: https://github.com/crate/cratedb-guide/pull/185

Timestamp: 2025-04-15T22:20:30.700Z
Learning: UUIDv7 (UUID version 7) supports efficient range queries because it generates time-ordered sequential values, unlike earlier random UUID versions. This makes UUIDv7 particularly useful for primary keys in distributed database systems like CrateDB where both uniqueness and range query performance are important.

Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.

@hlcianfagna hlcianfagna merged commit 15d7731 into main Apr 16, 2025
4 checks passed
@hlcianfagna hlcianfagna deleted the hlcianfagna/idsgeneration branch April 16, 2025 12:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants