Change LP.8.1.6 designations with other LP.8.1.* mutations: recurrent S:T22N #2934
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…nt S:T22N. Change designations of LP.8.1 + C28674T (N:A134V, LP.8.1.8-defining) + C21627A (S:T22N, LP.8.1.6-defining) from LP.8.1.6 to LP.8.1.8 because S:T22N seems more likely recurrent than N:A134V. Similarly, change designations of LP.8.1 + C3096T (ORF1a:S944L) + C21627A from LP.8.1.6 to LP.8.1 because there is an undesignated branch with C3096T and S:T22N seems more likely recurrent. HT @FedeGueli for pointing out that LP.8.1.6 is attracting these recurrences of S:T22N as well as NY.7 in the UShER tree.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Change designations of LP.8.1 + C28674T (N:A134V, LP.8.1.8-defining) + C21627A (S:T22N, LP.8.1.6-defining) from LP.8.1.6 to LP.8.1.8 because S:T22N seems more likely recurrent than N:A134V.
Similarly, change designations of LP.8.1 + C3096T (ORF1a:S944L) + C21627A from LP.8.1.6 to LP.8.1 because there is an undesignated branch with C3096T and S:T22N seems more likely recurrent.
HT @FedeGueli for pointing out that LP.8.1.6 is attracting these recurrences of S:T22N as well as NY.7 in the UShER tree.