Skip to content

upgrade imago to 0.1.4 #282

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 20, 2025
Merged

upgrade imago to 0.1.4 #282

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 20, 2025

Conversation

nohajc
Copy link
Contributor

@nohajc nohajc commented Mar 19, 2025

Fixes #275

Signed-off-by: Jan Noha <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@jakecorrenti jakecorrenti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM but we still need to wait for 1.4 to hit Fedora first

@tylerfanelli
Copy link
Member

tylerfanelli commented Mar 20, 2025

Why do we need to wait for a Fedora release of imago?

@jakecorrenti
Copy link
Member

jakecorrenti commented Mar 20, 2025

Why do we need to wait for a Fedora release of imago?

I suppose I assumed that would be the case since we needed to vendor the crate before it was in Fedora. I should have phrased my original comment as a question of whether we needed to wait.

If that's not the case then everything looks good to me.

@tylerfanelli
Copy link
Member

We'll need it when we release for Fedora, but that's a downstream process requirement. We don't have to let upstream wait because of it.

@tylerfanelli tylerfanelli merged commit e29be7e into containers:main Mar 20, 2025
5 checks passed
@jakecorrenti
Copy link
Member

We'll need it when we release for Fedora, but that's a downstream process requirement. We don't have to let upstream wait because of it.

Sounds good. Thanks for the clarification.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Question about physical block devices
3 participants