-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.8k
raylib: simpler callbacks #35488
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
raylib: simpler callbacks #35488
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d51989b
simpler no current callback
sshane 37263ed
clean up
sshane 94b89e9
back
sshane 33c1fec
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into no-current-callback
sshane b016937
fixx
sshane 0dc4ecd
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into no-current-callback
sshane a038832
clean up
sshane b61a4e7
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into no-current-callback
sshane File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@deanlee let's decide on if we should use set functions or not soon, this is two different patterns for no reason
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
think using a set method for is clearer than direct assignment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some modules, like ui_state with offroad transition, may need multiple callbacks. Using a consistent set_ / add_ pattern makes it easier to manage them than assigning callbacks directly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What are your thoughts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#35493