Skip to content

References in paper.bib #155

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 12, 2025
Merged

References in paper.bib #155

merged 1 commit into from
May 12, 2025

Conversation

ewallace
Copy link
Collaborator

@ewallace ewallace commented May 5, 2025

Updated references in paper. bib to:

  • have caps protect for The Carpentries etc
  • correctly reference Carpentries lessons on zenodo w/dois
  • when stated in citation files, have editor fields not author fields for Carpentries lessons

Updated references in paper. bib to:
- have caps protect for The Carpentries etc
- correctly reference Carpentries lessons on zenodo w/dois
- when stated in citation files, have editor fields not author fields for Carpentries lessons
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 5, 2025

Thank you!

Thank you for your pull request 😃

🤖 This automated message can help you check the rendered files in your submission for clarity. If you have any questions, please feel free to open an issue in {sandpaper}.

If you have files that automatically render output (e.g. R Markdown), then you should check for the following:

  • 🎯 correct output
  • 🖼️ correct figures
  • ❓ new warnings
  • ‼️ new errors

Rendered Changes

🔍 Inspect the changes: https://github.com/carpentries-lab/good-enough-practices/compare/md-outputs..md-outputs-PR-155

The following changes were observed in the rendered markdown documents:


What does this mean?

If you have source files that require output and figures to be generated (e.g. R Markdown), then it is important to make sure the generated figures and output are reproducible.

This output provides a way for you to inspect the output in a diff-friendly manner so that it's easy to see the changes that occur due to new software versions or randomisation.

⏱️ Updated at 2025-05-05 09:04:02 +0000

Copy link
Collaborator

@emma-wilson emma-wilson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good @ewallace, I'm happy for this to be merged :)

@ewallace ewallace marked this pull request as ready for review May 12, 2025 08:03
@ewallace ewallace merged commit 42dd994 into main May 12, 2025
3 checks passed
@ewallace ewallace deleted the ewallace-patch-1 branch May 12, 2025 08:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants