compiler: improve label grammar correctness #198
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I think having a Decl after a label is a compiler issue. The programmer should not have to type: label: ; to fix this.. |
I agree completely. The programmer does not add the |
chqrlie
force-pushed
the
label
branch
3 times, most recently
from
662b0a6 to
582dba7
Compare
* add `Stmt` pointer in `Label` structure. * fix grammar for labelled statements and definitions. eg: `if (cond) done: return 0;` is now a single statement. * accept labelled definitions (generates `label:;` in C code) * accept labels at end of block (generates `label:;` in C code) * add tests
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stmtpointer inLabelstructure.if (cond) done: return 0;is now a single statement.label:;)label:;)