[PM-21603]Invite Member sub text seat count does not account for sponsorships

[cyprain-okeke]

🎟️ Tracking

https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/PM-21603

📔 Objective

When an org has Family Sponsorships in a Sent or Active state, they consume an org seat

However, the Invite Member modal does not reflect these sponsorships in the available seat count

Replication steps

Enable the Admin Sponsored Families feature in the BW Admin Portal for desired Enterprise Org

In the Admin Console, go to Members > Free Bitwarden Families

Add sponsorship

Once sponsorship has been added, go to the Members > Members page

Invite member

Expected Result - The email field subtext should reflect the consumed seat in the ‘Enter up to x emails by separating with a comma.’

Actual Result - The email field subtext is not accounting for the sponsorship, so it displays an additional seat that is not actually available

📸 Screenshots

⏰ Reminders before review

• Contributor guidelines followed
• All formatters and local linters executed and passed
• Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
• Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
• Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
• CI builds passed
• Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
• Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

• 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
• 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
• ❓ (:question:) for questions
• 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
• 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
• ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
• 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
• ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

[github-actions]

Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details – f1c3c2fa-c1cf-4409-a2db-33a4d78c8338

Great job, no security vulnerabilities found in this Pull Request

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 36.26%. Comparing base (4bf1a3b) to head (7b1219f).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...console/organizations/members/members.component.ts	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
...response/organization-billing-metadata.response.ts	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #14954      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   36.26%   36.26%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        3202     3202              
  Lines       93265    93268       +3     
  Branches    16821    16821              
==========================================
  Hits        33825    33825              
- Misses      56998    57001       +3     
  Partials     2442     2442              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[r-tome]

Is it possible to do this without adding another api call? This page is already slow as is

[cyprain-okeke]

Is it possible to do this without adding another api call? This page is already slow as is

I am not sure, We have to get the number of admin family sponsored seat to get the outstanding seats

[r-tome]

Is it possible to do this without adding another api call? This page is already slow as is

I am not sure, We have to get the number of admin family sponsored seat to get the outstanding seats

Can't that be added to OrganizationBillingMetadataResponse?

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud