Skip to content

isSpent logic #250

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 21, 2015
Merged

isSpent logic #250

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 21, 2015

Conversation

kleetus
Copy link
Contributor

@kleetus kleetus commented Sep 21, 2015

closes #245

  • Bitcoind's CCoinsViewMempool brings the mempool into view, but will not consider outputs therein as spent
  • Changed the test description to match what is happening in that view
  • Once a given tx has one confirmation, then isSpent will be true for those outputs

- Bitcoind's CCoinsViewMempool brings the mempool into view, but will not consider outputs therein as spent
- Changed the test description to match what is happening in that view
- Once a given tx has one confirmation, then isSpent will be true for those outputs
@braydonf
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

braydonf pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 21, 2015
@braydonf braydonf merged commit 8a2a0ab into bitpay:master Sep 21, 2015
@kleetus kleetus deleted the feature/isSpent_mempool branch September 24, 2015 21:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

isSpent is incorrectly excluding the mempool
2 participants