Skip to content

New Test for media alternatives for text #388

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jun 6, 2023
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
25 changes: 23 additions & 2 deletions _baselines/17SyncMedia.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ Evaluation of captions and audio descriptions to assess its equivalence to synch

**Baseline Test ID:** 17.4-CaptionsPrerecorded
#### Identify Content
<p id="4IC">Pre-recorded synchronized multimedia that is not a media alternative for text and is clearly labeled as such.</p>
<p id="4IC">Pre-recorded synchronized multimedia that is not clearly labeled as a media alternative for text.</p>
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

visual and programmatic?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, your suggestion is much better.

Do you want the visual and programmatic included in the updated statement? The programmatic part would mean "media alternative for text" (or similar) has to be in the accessible name/desc.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Depends if "labeled" is usually understood to mean those already. Just wanted a way to clarify it if asked. A note would also work.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do not think "clearly labeled as such" means the accessible name. I think this is a visual label or description.

This is ACT's proposed rule for Audio element content is media alternative for text. It doesn't check programmatic label..

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Then should we specify "Visual" for clarity?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about something like this in the Assumptions section for appropriate rules:

Audio-only, video-only, and synchronized media can be "clearly labeled" as alternatives for text in various ways, including text alternatives and text descriptions. At a minimum, a visual label must be provided.


#### Test Instructions
<ol id="4TI">
Expand All @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ Evaluation of captions and audio descriptions to assess its equivalence to synch
**Baseline Test ID:** 17.5-ADPrerecorded

#### Identify Content
<p id="5IC">Pre-recorded synchronized multimedia.</p>
<p id="5IC">Pre-recorded synchronized multimedia that is not clearly labeled as a media alternative for text.</p>

#### Test Instructions
<ol id="5TI">
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -135,11 +135,32 @@ Evaluation of captions and audio descriptions to assess its equivalence to synch
#### Test Results
<p id="6TR">If any of the above checks fail, then Baseline Requirement 17.6-CaptionsLive fails.</p>

### 17.7 Test Procedure for Media Alternatives (Prerecorded)

**Baseline Test ID:** 17.7-MediaAlternative
#### Identify Content
<p id="7IC">Pre-recorded synchronized multimedia that is labeled as a media alternative for text.</p>

#### Test Instructions
<ol id="7TI">
<li id="7TI-1">Identify the text for which the media is an alternative.</li>
<li id="7TI-2">Play the media that is labeled as an equivalent alternative for the text.
<ul>
<li>Check that the meaningful audible information of the media is available in the text.</li>
<li>Check that the meaningful visual information of the media is available in the text.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ol>

#### Test Results
<p id="7TR">If any of the above checks fail, then the multimedia is not a media alternative for text. Perform Baseline Tests <a href="#174-test-procedure-for-captions-prerecorded">17.4 Test Procedure for Captions (Prerecorded)</a> and <a href="#175-test-procedure-for-audio-description-prerecorded">17.5 Test Procedure for Audio Description (Prerecorded)</a> on the pre-recorded synchronized multimedia. </p>

### Advisory: Tips for streamlined test processes

- Testing synchronized media is different from testing Baseline [16. Audio-Only and Video-Only content](../16AudioVideo).
- Synchronized media players may be software or HTML.
- At Level AA, SC 1.2.5 applies to synchronized media. The related Level A requirement, SC 1.2.3, should be marked as ‘Not Tested’ in the test report. It is permissible for test processes to add a test for SC 1.2.3 (evaluate a full text alternative for equivalence). Adding such a test would exceed baseline test requirements and would not affect Baseline 17’s outcome.
- All synchronized multimedia should be tested. If the pre-recorded multimedia is labeled as an media alternative for text, confirm that it provides equivalent information as text. If it does not, then it is not a media alternative for text. Test the multimedia for captions and audio descriptions

#### WCAG 2.0 Techniques
The following sufficient techniques and/or common failures were considered when developing this test procedure for this baseline requirement:
Expand Down
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion _baselines/ChangeLog3.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ Note: Minor punctuation, formatting and spelling changes not included.
| 13. Content Structure | Limitations, Assumptions, Exceptions: Added "A test for Visually Apparent Lists should not include navigation menus. While programmatic lists are often used to create navigation menus, menus may also be created using other techniques." |
| 13.4 Visually Apparent Lists | Moved HTML code from Identify Content to Test Instructions, added description of visual list, added more detail to test instructions |
| 16.1 Audio Only | Instruction 2: replaced image of text with an image-only PDF as a more real-world example |
| 17.4 Captions (Prerecorded) | Identify Content: added "that is not a media alternative for text and is clearly labeled as such" |
| 17.4 Captions (Prerecorded) and 17.5 Audio Descriptions (Prerecorded) | Identify Content of both: added "that is not clearly labeled as a media alternative for text" |
| 17.7 Media Alternatives (Prerecorded) | New test added |
| 18. CSS Content and Positioning | Accessibility Requirements: removed SC 1.3.1 |
| 19.1 Frames | Instruction 1: separated to 2 test instructions |
| Appendix A | Added Test Instructions with "check" and linked test instructions, sort function, links to Baselines and Test IDs |
Expand Down