-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 108
Fix #1076: Add server.summary() function #1077
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Fix #1076: Add server.summary() function #1077
Conversation
- summary(): Returns the server summary string or undefined - hasSummary(): Returns boolean indicating if summary exists
…in the Server class.
|
We require all PRs to follow Conventional Commits specification.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for creating your first pull request. Please check out our contributors guide useful for opening a pull request.
Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.
|
@shwetd19 please add a test into https://github.com/asyncapi/parser-js/blob/master/packages/parser/test/models/v3/server.spec.ts Additionally, fix the title of the PR as CI mentions Also, this PR doesn't fix the issue you mention in the description but #1076 instead. Please fix that as well 🙏 |
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴 It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this pull request, add a comment with detailed explanation. There can be many reasons why some specific pull request has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model. Let us figure out together how to push this pull request forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here. Thank you for your patience ❤️ |
Description
Related issue(s)
Fixes #1076