-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
Implement Async GCS object update sensor #93
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
- Implement the GCSPrefixBlobTrigger( - Implement the sensor GCSObjectWithPrefixExistenceSensor
- add example dag for GCSObjectsWithPrefixExistenceSensorAsync - modify trigger super.__init__
- Add GCSObjectUpdateSensorAsync Operator, Trigger
- Fix Snowflake Trigger, Operator, Hooks code coverage above 92 - Fix Redshift Cluster Trigger, Operator code coverage above 96
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added few comments and few changes.
One question - Is there a specific reason to keep certain methods as private methods in triggers rather than keeping in hooks?
- cover mypy issues - Fixed test case based on the mypy fix
- Add back the else condition and return value in hook along with test case covered - Add proper doc string - Remove unwanted print - Remove wired formatting for query and added test query with proper query
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please separate these into at least 2 or 3 PRs.
- Implements Async GCS Object Update Sensor
- Fixes Code Coverage
- Fixes MyPy issues
…r/astronomer-providers into GCS_ObjectUpdateSensor
FIx Flake8, and Fix pydocu
Added Two PR
|
I was following the existing implementation |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me
@kaxil @sunank200 are we good to merge this? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Story Id: #69