Skip to content

improvement: Expand aggregate test covering rem expression #2553

improvement: Expand aggregate test covering rem expression

improvement: Expand aggregate test covering rem expression #2553

Triggered via pull request May 2, 2025 15:15
Status Failure
Total duration 14m 50s
Artifacts 1

elixir.yml

on: pull_request
Matrix: ash-ci
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

6 errors and 3 warnings
ash-ci (14) / mix test
Process completed with exit code 2.
ash-ci (14) / mix test: test/aggregate_test.exs#L932
test sum aggregates show the same value with filters on the sum vs filters on relationships (AshSql.AggregateTest)
ash-ci (16) / mix test
Process completed with exit code 2.
ash-ci (16) / mix test: test/aggregate_test.exs#L932
test sum aggregates show the same value with filters on the sum vs filters on relationships (AshSql.AggregateTest)
ash-ci (15) / mix test
Process completed with exit code 2.
ash-ci (15) / mix test: test/aggregate_test.exs#L932
test sum aggregates show the same value with filters on the sum vs filters on relationships (AshSql.AggregateTest)
ash-ci (16) / mix sobelow
Range.new/2 and first..last default to a step of -1 when last < first. Use Range.new(first, last, -1) or first..last//-1, or pass 1 if that was your intention
ash-ci (14) / mix sobelow
Range.new/2 and first..last default to a step of -1 when last < first. Use Range.new(first, last, -1) or first..last//-1, or pass 1 if that was your intention
ash-ci (15) / mix sobelow
Range.new/2 and first..last default to a step of -1 when last < first. Use Range.new(first, last, -1) or first..last//-1, or pass 1 if that was your intention

Artifacts

Produced during runtime
Name Size Digest
github-pages Expired
367 KB
sha256:45b8f39c8c95aab129bc0e684deccd9aabfc45e551546eb7558e91a02e706a83