Skip to content

push a collection of small fixes to improve the documentation #737

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 12, 2025

Conversation

leggewie
Copy link
Contributor

push a collection of small fixes to improve the documentation

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 12, 2025

Walkthrough

This update consists of minor textual corrections in three files. In .github/labeler.yml, a comment was edited to correct the pluralization of "PRs." In docs/Developer-Guide_User-Configurations.md, wording was clarified by removing an extraneous word and simplifying a sentence about legacy user configuration, including the removal of an example line for adding packages. In docs/Process_CI.md, a grammatical error was fixed in a sentence describing the smoke testing process. No functional, structural, or procedural changes were made in any of the files.

Suggested labels

ready to merge

Tip

⚡️ Faster reviews with caching
  • CodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure Review - Disable Cache at either the organization or repository level. If you prefer to disable all data retention across your organization, simply turn off the Data Retention setting under your Organization Settings.

Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added size/small PR with less then 50 lines Needs review Seeking for review GitHub Actions GitHub Actions code labels May 12, 2025
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot added the Ready to merge Reviewed, tested and ready for merge label May 12, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/Developer-Guide_User-Configurations.md (1)

14-14: Add missing preposition for clarity
The sentence “Command-line parameters still can override what is the config file.” is missing “in.” Consider:

- Command-line parameters still can override what is the config file.
+ Command-line parameters still can override what is in the config file.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~14-~14: Possible missing preposition found.
Context: ...e parameters still can override what is the config file. More advanced use cases ca...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_IN)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 624c743 and e6cd51c.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/labeler.yml (1 hunks)
  • docs/Developer-Guide_User-Configurations.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/Process_CI.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/Developer-Guide_User-Configurations.md

[uncategorized] ~14-~14: Possible missing preposition found.
Context: ...e parameters still can override what is the config file. More advanced use cases ca...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_IN)

🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/labeler.yml (1)

1-1: Correct pluralization of "PRs"
Changing "PR's" to "PRs" fixes the possessive/plural mix-up. This is purely a textual update and has no effect on label matching logic.

docs/Process_CI.md (1)

252-252: Fix grammar: use "followed by"
Replacing "following by powering the devices off" with "followed by powering the devices off" corrects the verb form and improves readability.

docs/Developer-Guide_User-Configurations.md (2)

10-10: Clarify override behavior
The revised sentence “Patches with the same file name and path in the userpatches directory tree override those in the patch directory.” is clear and concise.


18-18: Remove outdated legacy example
Dropping the deprecated PACKAGE_LIST_ADDITIONAL example keeps the legacy configuration section focused on the core override mechanism.

@igorpecovnik igorpecovnik merged commit 63383f7 into armbian:main May 12, 2025
4 of 6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
GitHub Actions GitHub Actions code Needs review Seeking for review Ready to merge Reviewed, tested and ready for merge size/small PR with less then 50 lines
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants