|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +title: Server Side Pagination for Applications List and Watch APIs |
| 3 | +authors: |
| 4 | + - "@alexmt" |
| 5 | +sponsors: |
| 6 | + - "@jessesuen" |
| 7 | +reviewers: |
| 8 | + - TBD |
| 9 | +approvers: |
| 10 | + - TBD |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +creation-date: 2024-02-14 |
| 13 | +last-updated: 2024-02-14 |
| 14 | +--- |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +# Introduce Server Side Pagination for Applications List and Watch APIs |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +Improve Argo CD performance by introducing server side pagination for Applications List and Watch APIs. |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +## Open Questions [optional] |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +This is where to call out areas of the design that require closure before deciding to implement the |
| 23 | +design. |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +## Summary |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +The Argo CD API server currently returns all applications in a single response. This can be a performance |
| 29 | +bottleneck when there are a large number of applications. This proposal is to introduce server side pagination |
| 30 | +for the Applications List and Watch APIs. |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +## Motivation |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +The main motivation for this proposal it to improve the Argo CD UI responsiveness when there are a large number |
| 35 | +of applications. The API server memory usage increases with the number of applications however this is not critical |
| 36 | +and can be mitigated by increasing memory limits for the API server deployment. The UI however becames unresponsive |
| 37 | +even on a powerful machine when the number of applications increases 2000. The server side pagination will allow |
| 38 | +to reduce amount of data returned by the API server and improve the UI responsiveness. |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +### Goals |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +* Support server side pagination for Applications List and Watch APIs |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +* Leverage pagination in the Argo CD UI to improve responsiveness |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +* Leverage pagination in the Argo CD CLI to improve performance and reduce load on the API server |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | +### Non-Goals |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +* The API Server is known to use a lot of CPU while applying very large RBAC policies to a large number of applications. |
| 51 | + Even with pagination API still need to apply RBAC policies to return "last page" response. So the issueis not addressed by this proposal. |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +## Proposal |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +**Pagination Cursor** |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | +It is proposed to add `offset` and `limit` fields for pagination support in Application List API. |
| 58 | +The The Watch API is a bit more complex. Both Argo CD user interface and CLI are relying on the Watch API to display real time updates of Argo CD applications. |
| 59 | +The Watch API currently supports filtering by a project and an application name. In order to effectively |
| 60 | +implement server side pagination for the Watch API we cannot rely on the order of the applications returned by the API server. Instead of |
| 61 | +relying on the order it is proposed to rely on the application name and use it as a cursor for pagination. Both the Applications List and Watch |
| 62 | +APIs will be extended with the optional `minName` and `maxName` fields. The `minName` field will be used to specify the application name to start from |
| 63 | +and the `maxName` field will be used to specify the application name to end at. The fields should be added to the `ApplicationQuery` message |
| 64 | +which is used as a request payload for the Applications List and Watch APIs. |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +```proto |
| 67 | +message ApplicationQuery { |
| 68 | + // ... existing fields |
| 69 | + // New proto fields for server side pagination |
| 70 | + // the application name to start from (app with min name is included in response) |
| 71 | + optional string minName = 9; |
| 72 | + // the application name to end at (app with max name is included in response) |
| 73 | + optional string maxName = 10; |
| 74 | + // offset |
| 75 | + optional int64 offset = 18; |
| 76 | + // limit |
| 77 | + optional int64 limit = 19; |
| 78 | +} |
| 79 | +``` |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | +**Server Side Filtering** |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | +In order to support server side pagination the filtering has to be moved to the server side as well. `ApplicationQuery` message needs to be extended with the following fields: |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | +```proto |
| 86 | +message ApplicationQuery { |
| 87 | + // ... existing fields |
| 88 | + // New proto fields for server side filtering |
| 89 | + // the repos filter |
| 90 | + repeated string repos = 11; |
| 91 | + // the clusters filter |
| 92 | + repeated string clusters = 12; |
| 93 | + // the namespaces filter |
| 94 | + repeated string namespaces = 13; |
| 95 | + // the auth sync filter |
| 96 | + optional bool autoSyncEnabled = 14; |
| 97 | + // the sync status filter |
| 98 | + repeated string syncStatuses = 15; |
| 99 | + // the health status filter |
| 100 | + repeated string healthStatuses = 16; |
| 101 | + // search |
| 102 | + optional string search = 17; |
| 103 | +} |
| 104 | +``` |
| 105 | + |
| 106 | +The Argo CD UI should be updated to populate fields in the List and Watch API requests instead of performing filtering on the client side. |
| 107 | + |
| 108 | +**Applications Stats** |
| 109 | + |
| 110 | +The Argo CD UI displays the breakdown of the applications by the sync status, health status etc. Stats numbers are calculated on the client side |
| 111 | +and rely on the full list of applications returned by the API server. The server side pagination will break the stats calculation. The proposal is to |
| 112 | +intoduce a new `stats` field to the Applications List API response. The field will contain the breakdown of the applications by various statuses. |
| 113 | + |
| 114 | +```golang |
| 115 | +type ApplicationLabelStats struct { |
| 116 | + Key string `json:"key" protobuf:"bytes,1,opt,name=key"` |
| 117 | + Values []string `json:"values" protobuf:"bytes,2,opt,name=values"` |
| 118 | +} |
| 119 | + |
| 120 | +// ApplicationListStats holds additional information about the list of applications |
| 121 | +type ApplicationListStats struct { |
| 122 | + Total int64 `json:"total" protobuf:"bytes,1,opt,name=total"` |
| 123 | + TotalBySyncStatus map[SyncStatusCode]int64 `json:"totalBySyncStatus,omitempty" protobuf:"bytes,2,opt,name=totalBySyncStatus"` |
| 124 | + TotalByHealthStatus map[health.HealthStatusCode]int64 `json:"totalByHealthStatus,omitempty" protobuf:"bytes,3,opt,name=totalByHealthStatus"` |
| 125 | + AutoSyncEnabledCount int64 `json:"autoSyncEnabledCount" protobuf:"bytes,4,opt,name=autoSyncEnabledCount"` |
| 126 | + Destinations []ApplicationDestination `json:"destinations" protobuf:"bytes,5,opt,name=destinations"` |
| 127 | + Namespaces []string `json:"namespaces" protobuf:"bytes,6,opt,name=namespaces"` |
| 128 | + Labels []ApplicationLabelStats `json:"labels,omitempty" protobuf:"bytes,7,opt,name=labels"` |
| 129 | +} |
| 130 | +``` |
| 131 | + |
| 132 | +The `stats` filter should be populated with information about all applications returned by the API server even when single page is loaded. |
| 133 | +The Argo CD UI should be updated to use the stats returned by the API server instead of calculating the stats on the client side. |
| 134 | + |
| 135 | +**Argo CD CLI** |
| 136 | + |
| 137 | +The Argo CD CLI should be updated to support server side pagination. The `argocd app list` command should be updated to support `--offset` and `--limit` flags. |
| 138 | +If the `--offset` and `--limit` flags are not specified the CLI should use pagination to load all applications in batches of 500 applications. |
| 139 | + |
| 140 | +### Use cases |
| 141 | + |
| 142 | +Add a list of detailed use cases this enhancement intends to take care of. |
| 143 | + |
| 144 | +#### User Server Side Pagination in Argo CD User Interface to improve responsiveness: |
| 145 | +As a user, I would like to be able to navigate through the list of applications using the pagination controls. |
| 146 | + |
| 147 | +#### User Server Side Pagination in Argo CD CLI to reduce load on the API server: |
| 148 | +As a user, I would like to use Argo CD CLI to list applications while leveraging the pagination without overloading the API server. |
| 149 | + |
| 150 | +### Implementation Details/Notes/Constraints [optional] |
| 151 | + |
| 152 | +**Application Stats** |
| 153 | + |
| 154 | +**CLI Backward Compatibility** |
| 155 | + |
| 156 | +Typically we bump minimal supported API version when we introduce a new feature in CLI. In this case I |
| 157 | +suggest to support gracefully missing pagination support in CLI. If the API server returns more applications than |
| 158 | +specified in `limit` the CLI should assume pagination is not supported and response has full list of applications. |
| 159 | +This way the user can downgrade API server without downgrading CLI. |
| 160 | + |
| 161 | +### Security Considerations |
| 162 | + |
| 163 | +The proposal does not introduce any new security risks. |
| 164 | + |
| 165 | +### Risks and Mitigations |
| 166 | + |
| 167 | +We might need to bump minimal supported API version in CLI to support pagination. The `Implementation Details` section |
| 168 | +contains the proposal to avoid doing it. |
| 169 | + |
| 170 | +### Upgrade / Downgrade Strategy |
| 171 | + |
| 172 | +The proposal does not introduce any breaking changes. The API server should gracefully handle requests without pagination fields. |
| 173 | + |
| 174 | +## Drawbacks |
| 175 | + |
| 176 | +None. |
| 177 | + |
| 178 | +## Alternatives |
| 179 | + |
| 180 | +**** |
0 commit comments