Skip to content

Add a documentation for warmed containers configurations. #5282

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 15, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
52 changes: 52 additions & 0 deletions docs/warmed-containers.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
<!--
#
# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
# contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
# this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
# The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
# (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
# the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
#
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
#
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
# limitations under the License.
#
-->

# Warmed Containers

Warmed containers can improve their performance by skipping the container initialization step.
It may be beneficial to configure the number of warmed containers to keep, and the duration to keep them according to the characteristics of workloads.

## Configuration

The configurations are only effective with the FPC scheduler.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this isn't totally true since some of the configurations already existed right?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

warmedContainerKeepingCount and warmedContainerKeepingTimeout are only effective in FPContainerProxy.

They can be configured using the limit configurations for each namespace.

```scala
case class UserLimits(invocationsPerMinute: Option[Int] = None,
concurrentInvocations: Option[Int] = None,
firesPerMinute: Option[Int] = None,
allowedKinds: Option[Set[String]] = None,
storeActivations: Option[Boolean] = None,
warmedContainerKeepingCount: Option[Int] = None,
warmedContainerKeepingTimeout: Option[String] = None)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This overrides the system wide idle timeout? I didn't even know this existed

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, so do I. So I added them.

```

So those can be configured in the same way that operators configure the `invocationPerMinute` limit.

```json
{
"_id": "guest/limits",
"invocationPerMinutes": 10,
"warmedContainerKeepingCount": 8,
"warmedContainerKeepingTimeout": "24 hours"
}
```

The namespace-specific configurations would override the default, system-wide configurations.
In the above example, the system will keep 8 warmed containers for 24 hours even if there is no activation at all.