-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 230
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Incubator-kie-issues-3871] Repeating timer gets executed immediately #3872
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ public void testParseRepeatablePeriodOnly() { | |||
|
|||
assertThat(parsedRepeatable[0]).isEqualTo(-1L); | |||
// Default delay time is 1000ms | |||
assertThat(parsedRepeatable[1]).isEqualTo(1000L); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we need to cover this targeted logic, we can add below junit
@Test
public void testDefaultDelay() {
String isoString = "R/PT0M";
long[] parsedRepeatable = DateTimeUtils.parseRepeatableDateTime(isoString);
// Default delay time is 1000ms
assertThat(parsedRepeatable[1]).isEqualTo(1000L);
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should have the same test here as it was used in v7:
https://github.com/kiegroup/jbpm/blob/main/jbpm-flow/src/test/java/org/jbpm/process/core/timer/DateTimeUtilsTest.java#L126-L136
In the new syntax, this would be:
assertThat(parsedRepeatable[0]).isEqualTo(-1L);
assertThat(parsedRepeatable[1] <= MINUTE_IN_MILLISECONDS).as("Parsed delay is bigger than " + MINUTE_IN_MILLISECONDS).isTrue();
assertThat(parsedRepeatable[1] > FIFTY_NINE_SECONDS_IN_MILLISECONDS)
.as("Parsed delay is too low! Expected value is between " + MINUTE_IN_MILLISECONDS + " and " + FIFTY_NINE_SECONDS_IN_MILLISECONDS + " but is " + parsedRepeatable[1]).isTrue();
assertThat(parsedRepeatable[2]).as("Parsed period should be one minute in milliseconds but is " + parsedRepeatable[2]).isEqualTo(MINUTE_IN_MILLISECONDS);
Not directly linked to this change, but as you are on it, I think it might be a good idea to add the additional tests from v7 (starting in L138) to the codebase as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@martinweiler Thank you for looking into this. I have included additional tests as you suggested.Please take a look.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great job @abhijithumbe
#3871
Using timer node with timer expression R/PT5M, the job gets executed immediately, then in the configured 5min intervals.