-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
Topn lazy materialize poc rebase #51329
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
HappenLee
merged 2 commits into
apache:master
from
hubgeter:topn-lazy-materialize-poc_rebase
May 29, 2025
Merged
Topn lazy materialize poc rebase #51329
HappenLee
merged 2 commits into
apache:master
from
hubgeter:topn-lazy-materialize-poc_rebase
May 29, 2025
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Please clearly describe your PR:
|
run buildall |
Cloud UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage Increment coverage report
|
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 33729 ms
|
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 192290 ms
|
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 29.43 s
|
englefly
approved these changes
May 29, 2025
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
morningman
approved these changes
May 29, 2025
16 tasks
morningman
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2025
### What problem does this PR solve? Related PR: #51329 Problem Summary: The `LogicalHudiScan` class should overload the method `withOperativeSlots` and return the `LogicalHudiScan` type. Otherwise, the `LogicalFileScanToPhysicalFileScan` rule will be incorrectly applied when querying the hudi table, resulting in the generation of `PhysicalFileScan`. Because `plan` is `LogicalFileScan`, `plan -> !(plan instanceof LogicalHudiScan)` will incorrectly return true. ```java public class LogicalFileScanToPhysicalFileScan extends OneImplementationRuleFactory { @OverRide public Rule build() { return logicalFileScan().when(plan -> !(plan instanceof LogicalHudiScan)).then(fileScan -> new PhysicalFileScan( fileScan.getRelationId(), fileScan.getTable(), fileScan.getQualifier(), DistributionSpecAny.INSTANCE, Optional.empty(), fileScan.getLogicalProperties(), fileScan.getSelectedPartitions(), fileScan.getTableSample(), fileScan.getTableSnapshot(), fileScan.getOperativeSlots()) ).toRule(RuleType.LOGICAL_FILE_SCAN_TO_PHYSICAL_FILE_SCAN_RULE); } } ```
16 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #xxx
Related PR: #xxx
Problem Summary:
Release note
None
Check List (For Author)
Test
Behavior changed:
Does this need documentation?
Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)