Fix datetime validation #50116
Merged
Fix datetime validation #50116
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
guan404ming
requested review from
bbovenzi,
pierrejeambrun,
ryanahamilton,
jscheffl and
shubhamraj-git
as code owners
guan404ming
force-pushed
the
fix-date-validation
branch
from
ff3689f to
cfa92c7
Compare
jscheffl
approved these changes
May 2, 2025
|
Thanks! |
|
Thanks for the suggestion and review! |
2 tasks
kaxil
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 6, 2025
(cherry picked from commit 205a672)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related Issue
fixed: #50103
cc: @bbovenzi @jscheffl @RNHTTR
Why
Date field validation seems not work or not obvious enough.
How
dayjs().isvalid()console.logalignItems="flex-start"(Fix date range field alignment #50086 (review))^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.