Add --one-pass-only parameter to breeze docs build command #30555
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The parameter was previously supported in the docs-build script but it was not exposed via breeze commands. It allows to iterate faster on docs building, by default docs building runs up to 3 passes in order to account for new cross-references between multiple providers, this flag makes it one pass, which makes it faster to summarize the errors when you try to nail down a problem with docs.
potiuk
force-pushed
the
add-one-pass-only-to-docs-build
branch
from
9515e53 to
37bda61
Compare
uranusjr
approved these changes
Apr 10, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The parameter was previously supported in the docs-build script but it was not exposed via breeze commands.
It allows to iterate faster on docs building, by default docs building runs up to 3 passes in order to account for new cross-references between multiple providers, this flag makes it one pass, which makes it faster to summarize the errors when you try to nail down a problem with docs.
^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.