Skip to content

Add description of the provider suspension process #30359

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 4, 2023

Conversation

potiuk
Copy link
Member

@potiuk potiuk commented Mar 29, 2023

Following discussion at the devlist, we are adding description of the suspension process for providers that hold us back from upgrading old dependencies. Discussion here:

https://lists.apache.org/thread/j98bgw9jo7xr4fvjh27d6bfoyxr1omcm


^ Add meaningful description above

Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

@potiuk potiuk force-pushed the add-suspension-process-for-providers branch from 75991d0 to 3a5ae41 Compare March 29, 2023 18:40
Following discussion at the devlist, we are adding description
of the suspension process for providers that hold us back from
upgrading old dependencies. Discussion here:

https://lists.apache.org/thread/j98bgw9jo7xr4fvjh27d6bfoyxr1omcm

Co-authored-by: Daniel Standish <[email protected]>
@potiuk potiuk force-pushed the add-suspension-process-for-providers branch from ebae52c to 1c7f3aa Compare March 30, 2023 07:12
@potiuk
Copy link
Member Author

potiuk commented Mar 30, 2023

Following the comment of @r-richmond I updated the process to reflect that we might want to include suspension in the patchlevel releases as well.

@potiuk
Copy link
Member Author

potiuk commented Apr 1, 2023

The LAZY CONSENSUS is reached - looking for approvals here.

Copy link
Contributor

@ferruzzi ferruzzi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I read it over and followed the discussion, any questions I had were already covered and I just realized I never actually hit that +1(non-binding)

@potiuk
Copy link
Member Author

potiuk commented Apr 4, 2023

Are we good to go ?

@potiuk potiuk merged commit 600cca1 into apache:main Apr 4, 2023
@potiuk potiuk deleted the add-suspension-process-for-providers branch April 4, 2023 16:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants