Skip to content

svm repo split: decouple dev deps: reserved-account-keys #7459

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

buffalojoec
Copy link

Problem

We have to decouple any uses of agave- crates in the dev-dependencies of the crates slated to move to the new SVM repo.

Summary of Changes

Simply uses HashSet directly instead of bringing in the agave-reserved-account-keys dev-dependency only to use empty_key_set.

Part of #7317

@buffalojoec buffalojoec requested a review from a team as a code owner August 12, 2025 07:03
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 83.2%. Comparing base (8abf225) to head (2f44145).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master    #7459     +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage    83.2%    83.2%   -0.1%     
=========================================
  Files         800      800             
  Lines      362695   362685     -10     
=========================================
- Hits       302103   302078     -25     
- Misses      60592    60607     +15     
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@buffalojoec buffalojoec merged commit c048acc into anza-xyz:master Aug 12, 2025
51 checks passed
@buffalojoec buffalojoec deleted the svm-repo-split-dedev-reserved-account-keys branch August 12, 2025 20:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants