Skip to content

when get_solution_data method is used the user can pass a list of variations with values or a dict #1065

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 20, 2022

Conversation

maxcapodi78
Copy link
Collaborator

There was an issue when list was passed that is now fixed

…iations with values or a dict. There was an issue when list was passed that is now fixed
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 20, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #1065 (5d1af23) into main (a1370d0) will increase coverage by 0.18%.
The diff coverage is 90.90%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1065      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.40%   80.58%   +0.18%     
==========================================
  Files         132      132              
  Lines       40781    40953     +172     
==========================================
+ Hits        32788    33004     +216     
+ Misses       7993     7949      -44     

maxcapodi78 added 2 commits April 20, 2022 12:27
…iations with values or a dict. There was an issue when list was passed that is now fixed
…iations with values or a dict. There was an issue when list was passed that is now fixed
Copy link
Member

@Samuelopez-ansys Samuelopez-ansys left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@maxcapodi78 maxcapodi78 merged commit 0efa905 into main Apr 20, 2022
@maxcapodi78 maxcapodi78 deleted the convert_post_variations_dict_fix branch April 20, 2022 12:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants