fix(Examples): Fix RTC and RTC_Backup Example ERFO Initialization for MAX32655 #760
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Jake-Carter
requested review from
lorne-maxim,
Jacob-Scheiffler and
sihyung-maxim
Jacob-Scheiffler
approved these changes
Oct 6, 2023
lorne-maxim
approved these changes
Oct 9, 2023
EricB-ADI
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
The RTC and RTC_Backup example for the ME17 had some weird register-level initialization of the ERFO, which somehow reset the board and prevented the examples from running.
Replacing it with API calls fixes the problem and the examples run cleanly.
Checklist Before Requesting Review