forked from flame/blis
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
Request: Fix compatibility with reference LAPACK v3.12.1 #31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
[AMD Official Use Only - AMD Internal Distribution Only]
Hi Greg,
Thanks for bringing this to our attention, we will work on it.
Thank you.
Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
…________________________________
From: Greg Jones ***@***.***>
Sent: Friday, March 7, 2025 7:44:09 PM
To: amd/blis ***@***.***>
Cc: Subscribed ***@***.***>
Subject: [amd/blis] Request: Fix compatibility with reference LAPACK v3.12.1 (Issue #31)
Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
Hello,
The reference LAPACK implementation now relies on a new extension to the reference BLAS implementation, *gemmtr (already implemented in BLIS as bli_gemmt). Could alias changes akin to upstream in flame#849<flame#849> be implemented to restore compatibility?
Thanks,
Greg
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#31>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADAJQWGMM5QTNNG5NAMWC3L2TGSTDAVCNFSM6AAAAABYRKAWYSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSHEYDGMJRGUYTKNI>.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
[greghjones]greghjones created an issue (amd/blis#31)<#31>
Hello,
The reference LAPACK implementation now relies on a new extension to the reference BLAS implementation, *gemmtr (already implemented in BLIS as bli_gemmt). Could alias changes akin to upstream in flame#849<flame#849> be implemented to restore compatibility?
Thanks,
Greg
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#31>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADAJQWGMM5QTNNG5NAMWC3L2TGSTDAVCNFSM6AAAAABYRKAWYSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSHEYDGMJRGUYTKNI>.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
kvaragan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 9, 2025
Copy changes from upstream BLIS to add gemmtr interfaces to match new BLAS functionality in recent LAPACK releases. This addresses #31, thanks to Greg Jones for reporting this issue. AMD-Internal: [CPUPL-6581] Change-Id: I2b1a724d80902541b1d2b073fa3d1ea71442f445
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hello,
The reference LAPACK implementation now relies on a new extension to the reference BLAS implementation, *gemmtr (already implemented in BLIS as
bli_gemmt
). Could alias changes akin to upstream in flame#849 be implemented to restore compatibility?Thanks,
Greg
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: