Add containers.agda-lib
to lib
directory
#406
Draft
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
DO NOT MERGE! Please merge #405 first.
This pull request adds a library
lib/containers/containers.agda-lib
which imports large chunks of theData.Map
andData.Set
modules from the containers package, including proofs.Comments
I have chosen to not add the prefix
Haskell.
to the module namesData.Map.Prop
andData.Set.Prop
, because:Data.Map.Prop
part of, say, acontainers-prop.cabal
package and make the proven properties available as a Haskell package. (The properties cannot be reused for proofs in Haskell Land, but at least they can be exported as "this has been proven!" to Haskell Land.)I was not quite sure whether to choose the name
Data.Set.Prop
orData.Set.Law
. John Hughes appears to use both "law" and "property" synonymously, while using "law" more often. Perhaps a good distinction is that the "laws" are closer to being complete while "properties" are mostly "haphazard" consequences.