-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 322
Remove JavaTestRunner #4864
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Yes, that was the next step in the 'evolution' of this automation (stripping away unneeded layers). |
@annaibm can you take a look at this one? Thanks |
annaibm
added a commit
to annaibm/aqa-tests
that referenced
this issue
Nov 24, 2023
-This code updates the custom tests to use JavatestUtil instead of JavaTestRunner. resolves: adoptium#4864 Signed-off-by: Anna Babu Palathingal <[email protected]>
annaibm
added a commit
to annaibm/aqa-tests
that referenced
this issue
Nov 24, 2023
-This code updates the custom tests to use JavatestUtil instead of JavaTestRunner. resolves: adoptium#4864 Signed-off-by: Anna Babu Palathingal <[email protected]>
annaibm
added a commit
to annaibm/aqa-tests
that referenced
this issue
Nov 24, 2023
-This code updates the custom tests to use JavatestUtil instead of JavaTestRunner. resolves: adoptium#4864 Signed-off-by: Anna Babu Palathingal <[email protected]>
annaibm
added a commit
to annaibm/aqa-tests
that referenced
this issue
Nov 24, 2023
- This code updates the custom tests to use JavatestUtil instead of JavaTestRunner. - Removes JavaTestRunner file resolves: adoptium#4864 Signed-off-by: Anna Babu Palathingal <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
JavaTestRunner and JavatestUtil are similar file.
And most of tests are using JavatestUtil except
aqa-tests/jck/jck.mk
Line 129 in 4a1eca1
https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aadoptium%2Faqa-tests%20JCK_CMD_TEMPLATE&type=code
I think if we update these two tests to run via JavatestUtil, we can remove JavaTestRunner.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: