Added the ruby html extension .erb to be reconized as html

[ghost]

Added the .erb to the html case of languages.json. This to recognise the ruby on rails extension .erb as html.

[pthiess]

Community pull request - open to anyone to grab.

[jbalsas]

@madebytrolls I was going to get this in, but I also saw #3122 lined up, which may address some issue with ruby. After that pull request settles in, you could map .html.erb to html and .erb to Ruby. Is it possible that you could benefit from this? If so, I'd recommend to close this one and create a new one with that differentiation in mind once #3122 gets merged. (I have no experience with ruby... @DennisKehrig could you chime in on this?).

[DennisKehrig]

@madebytrolls That would indeed be a bit better, since .erb isn't necessarily HTML - for instance, I have a mail template in one project called "summary.text.plain.erb" alongside "summary.text.html.erb". I think Ruby is a reasonable fallback for .erb, and it would work exactly as you described. :)

[ghost]

Agreed

[jbalsas]

@madebytrolls Support for complex file extensions just landed in #3285. Just saying, in case you're interested in giving this another try ;)

[kidwm]

@jbalsas I'm using Sprint 23 on Mac OS X, but it did not works on any file names like index.html.erb or layout.erb in RoR.

[TomMalbran]

It looks like the support was added, but the extension wasn't added to the languages.json file to make the parsing work.

[peterflynn]

Yes -- if you look at the status at the top of the pull request, it was never actually merged. The new APIs added in Sprint 23 should make it possible to write a new pull request that we can merge -- but no one has had the time to do that yet.