Skip to content

feat: document about modernjs plugin dependency #125

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 18, 2025

Conversation

arthurfiorette
Copy link
Member

@arthurfiorette arthurfiorette commented Jun 17, 2025

What's added in this PR?

Since modern.js is a framework built on top of Webpack or Rspack, users need to install both the Zephyr ModernJS plugin and the Rspack or Webpack plugin, depending on their bundler choice.

(Required) Pre-PR/Merge checklist

  • I have added/updated our feature to sync with this PR
  • I have added an explanation of my changes
  • I have/will run tests, or ask for help to add test

@arthurfiorette arthurfiorette self-assigned this Jun 17, 2025
Copy link

claude bot commented Jun 17, 2025

Claude finished @arthurfiorette's task —— View job


Comprehensive PR Review ✅

Purpose Summary: Adds critical documentation about dual plugin dependencies (ModernJS + bundler plugins) to prevent incomplete setup configurations.

Todo List:

  • Read and analyze the changed documentation file
  • Review changes for quality, accuracy, and best practices
  • Provide structured feedback with severity table and recommendations
  • Assign overall quality score and next steps

Review Analysis

📋 Issues & Recommendations Table
Severity Line(s) Issue Recommendation
Low 78-80 Info box could be more specific about bundler selection Add guidance: "Modern.js defaults to rspack, but you can configure webpack in modern.config.ts"
Low 90-95, 102-107, 114-119 Repetitive comment structure could be streamlined Consider consolidating comments or using a table format for cleaner presentation
Low 77-80 Minor grammatical issue Change "depending on your bundler choice" to "depending on which bundler you're using"

Detailed Assessment

Strengths

  • Critical Fix: Addresses a real setup issue where users would install incomplete dependencies
  • Clear Architecture Explanation: The info box properly explains the Modern.js → Webpack/Rspack dependency chain
  • Consistent Formatting: All three package managers (npm/yarn/pnpm) follow identical patterns
  • Proper Documentation Structure: Uses appropriate MDX info boxes and code blocks
  • Version Specification: Correctly uses @latest for consistent installations

📝 Areas for Enhancement

Documentation Clarity (Low Priority)

  • The bundler selection guidance could be more explicit about Modern.js defaults
  • Consider adding a brief explanation of rspack vs webpack differences/benefits

Code Example

::: info

Since Modern.js is a framework built on top of Webpack or Rspack, you need to install both the Zephyr ModernJS plugin and the corresponding bundler plugin. Modern.js defaults to rspack for better performance, but you can configure webpack in your modern.config.ts if needed.

:::

🔒 Security Assessment

  • No security concerns: All dependencies are from trusted sources with proper versioning
  • Package integrity: Uses @latest which is appropriate for getting started guides

📖 Readability & Maintainability

  • Excellent structure: Proper use of tabs, code blocks, and info boxes
  • Maintainable: Changes follow existing documentation patterns
  • Consistent: Maintains the established style throughout the document

Quality Score: 8.5/10

Justification: This is a high-quality documentation improvement that solves a real user experience problem. The implementation is clean, consistent, and follows documentation best practices. Minor improvements in clarity and structure prevent a perfect score.


🎯 Top 3 Next Steps

  1. Enhance bundler guidance - Add brief explanation of when to choose rspack vs webpack
  2. Consider setup validation - Potentially add a troubleshooting section for common plugin installation issues
  3. Example verification - Ensure the installation commands work correctly across all environments

Overall Assessment:Approved with minor suggestions

This PR successfully addresses a critical gap in the setup instructions that would have caused user frustration. The implementation is solid and maintains documentation quality standards.

Copy link

alwaysmeticulous bot commented Jun 17, 2025

🤖 No test run has been triggered as your Meticulous project has been deactivated (since you haven't viewed any test results in a while). Click here to reactivate.

Last updated for commit a4d36b6. This comment will update as new commits are pushed.

Copy link
Contributor

@zmzlois zmzlois left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

small tweaks but otherwise looks good

@zmzlois zmzlois merged commit c055912 into main Jun 18, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants