Possible to use with Distributed?

[thomvet]

I am trying to test a Server/Client application and would like to employ SafeTestsets.jl. However, it seems that the use of @Everywhere and @spawnat within a @safetestset causes previously working tests to fail. Is this a scoping issue? (Macros evaluating into Main instead of the module generated by SafeTestsets.jl?

Any advice on how to circumvent this issue?

[ChrisRackauckas]

Yes Distributed wants to work in Main and this adds a module. We generally just don't mix it with distributed for that reason, and leave distributed tests as the last test set without a safetestset for that issue.

[thomvet]

Ok, so that combination is just currently not possible then and I'll have to actually bother writing a clean testset myself rather than relying on this package to rescue me :)

Thanks for the rapid response.

[spawnat]

why am I mentioned in this thread?

…

-spawnat

On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 3:44 PM Thomas Vetter ***@***.***> wrote: Ok, so that combination is just currently not possible then and I'll have to actually bother writing a clean testset myself rather than relying on this package to rescue me :) Thanks for the rapid response. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#13 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A5MSNYB6GNO7M7UGP3CSB4DYHYY4DAVCNFSM6AAAAABAGSWAF6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMZZGQ2DMMBUHA> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[thomvet]

Sorry, that was unintentional. There's an @ spawnat macro in Julia....