BUG: Consolidate extension metadata with one set in extension build-system #2039
Conversation
…ystem This changes were manually crafted by comparing the values hard-coded in the s4ext and the one hard-coded in the corresponding CMake file.
jcfr
force-pushed
the
consolidate-extension-metadata
branch
from
a5839d4 to
f218427
Compare
| @@ -6,9 +6,9 @@ depends NA | |||
|
|
|||
| build_subdirectory inner-build | |||
|
|
|||
| homepage https://github.com/SlicerDMRI/whitematteranalysis | |||
| homepage https://github.com/SlicerDMRI/SlicerWMA#readme | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It appears the SlicerWMA repo was recently named to “SlicerWMA-OLD”.
https://github.com/SlicerDMRI/SlicerWMA-OLD
@jhlegarreta Is this an indication that SlicerDMRI wants to remove the SlicerWMA extension from the Slicer extensions index? Or will there be a new repo for SlicerWMA?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Apologies James, but I was/am not aware of the potential related conversations: @jcfr is probably in a better position to answer the question: SlicerDMRI/SlicerWMA#11
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@jhlegarreta Do you happen to know who renamed the repository from SlicerWMA to SlicerWMA-OLD? The issue I created is intended to help understand the rational and provide some clarification.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Wow, I thought it was you JC. Really sorry for having assumed that. It was not me, and I had no discussion about renaming it with anybody: I only realized about the renaming after I got notified by GitHub about the issue you opened, and thus I mistakenly linked both things.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@ljod and I have been working with @zhangfanmark to update this. So this extension (SlicerWMA) is being deprecated in favor of https://github.com/SlicerDMRI/SlicerTractParcellation which is still being worked on #2037
|
In the meantime, I will move forward with the integration. |
No description provided.