Skip to content

Migrate Ruby LSP add-on to RBS comments #2304

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 3, 2025

Conversation

vinistock
Copy link
Member

@vinistock vinistock commented Jun 2, 2025

Motivation

Migrate all of the Tapioca add-on to RBS comments since we're going to remove the Ruby LSP's dependency on the sorbet-runtime gem. This will make sure that Tapioca is ready for the breaking change ahead of time.

Implementation

Just migrated everything to the RBS comment syntax. I also made some minor style modifications.

Tests

Current tests should cover it.

Copy link
Member Author

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@vinistock vinistock added the refactor Code refactor with no behaviour change label Jun 2, 2025 — with Graphite App
@vinistock vinistock self-assigned this Jun 2, 2025
@vinistock vinistock requested review from KaanOzkan and Morriar June 2, 2025 13:46
@vinistock vinistock marked this pull request as ready for review June 2, 2025 13:46
@vinistock vinistock requested a review from a team as a code owner June 2, 2025 13:46
@vinistock vinistock added the chore label Jun 2, 2025
@vinistock vinistock force-pushed the 06-02-migrate_ruby_lsp_add-on_to_rbs_comments branch from a6ec5f5 to aedfc5d Compare June 2, 2025 18:15
@vinistock vinistock merged commit 064c7be into main Jun 3, 2025
17 checks passed
@vinistock vinistock deleted the 06-02-migrate_ruby_lsp_add-on_to_rbs_comments branch June 3, 2025 15:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
chore refactor Code refactor with no behaviour change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants