You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for your great contribution.
I found that currently, if a paper is cited in two separate chapters, it often appears twice in the reference list, which may be due to the non-unified bibtex.
Here are a few examples:
[206], [207]
[225], [227]
[254], [255]
[829], [830]
[833], [834]
... ...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for your great contribution.
I found that currently, if a paper is cited in two separate chapters, it often appears twice in the reference list, which may be due to the non-unified bibtex.
Here are a few examples:
[206], [207]
[225], [227]
[254], [255]
[829], [830]
[833], [834]
... ...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: