Skip to content

Fix sectorscalartype fallback definition for UniqueFusion() sector types #8

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 7, 2025
Merged

Fix sectorscalartype fallback definition for UniqueFusion() sector types #8

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 7, 2025

Conversation

lkdvos
Copy link
Member

@lkdvos lkdvos commented Mar 7, 2025

@codecov Codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 7, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 90.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/sectors.jl 90.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/sectors.jl 83.45% <90.00%> (+4.50%) ⬆️
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@lkdvos lkdvos merged commit 4ca9089 into main Mar 7, 2025
8 checks passed
@lkdvos lkdvos deleted the sectorscalartype branch March 7, 2025 16:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@lkdvos