Skip to content

refactor: put reused codes into 2 components #1614

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 29, 2024
Merged

refactor: put reused codes into 2 components #1614

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 29, 2024

Conversation

Nick-1979
Copy link
Member

@Nick-1979 Nick-1979 commented Oct 29, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced new components for better account display: AccountBodyFs and AccountIdenticonIconsFS.
    • Enhanced modularity by integrating new components into the AccountInformationForHome and AccountInformationForDetails components.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed unused imports and functionalities to streamline component performance.
  • Refactor

    • Updated component structure and logic for improved clarity and maintainability.
    • Replaced the useInfo hook with useAccount for simplified account information retrieval.

These changes enhance the user experience by providing a more organized and efficient interface for managing account details.

@Nick-1979 Nick-1979 requested a review from AMIRKHANEF October 29, 2024 05:05
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 29, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@Nick-1979 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 24 minutes and 36 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ceb6465 and 3a8c822.

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several modifications across multiple components in the Polkadot extension. Key changes include reordering parameters in the ShortAddress2 component, removal of unused imports and functionalities in AccountInformationForDetails, and the introduction of new components like AccountBodyFs and AccountIdenticonIconsFS. The AccountInformationForHome component has been refactored to utilize these new components while simplifying its logic. Overall, the changes focus on improving code organization and maintainability.

Changes

File Change Summary
packages/extension-polkagate/src/components/ShortAddress2.tsx - Reordered parameters in ShortAddress2 function signature.
- Moved AccountId import to the top.
- Added dependency on pRef.current?.offsetWidth in useEffect.
packages/extension-polkagate/src/fullscreen/accountDetails/components/AccountInformationForDetails.tsx - Removed EyeIconFullScreen, Identicon, and IconButton imports.
- Eliminated useIdentity hook.
- Introduced AccountBodyFs component.
- Adjusted JSX structure.
packages/extension-polkagate/src/fullscreen/homeFullScreen/partials/AccountBodyFs.tsx - Added AccountBodyFs component with visibility toggle and account display logic.
- Utilizes useInfo and useIdentity hooks.
packages/extension-polkagate/src/fullscreen/homeFullScreen/partials/AccountIdenticonIconsFS.tsx - Introduced AccountIdenticonIconsFS component for account identicon display.
- Utilizes useInfo and useIdentity hooks.
packages/extension-polkagate/src/fullscreen/homeFullScreen/partials/AccountInformationForHome.tsx - Replaced useInfo with useAccount hook.
- Integrated AccountIdenticonIconsFS and AccountBodyFs.
- Removed toggleVisibility function.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • AMIRKHANEF

🐰 In the garden where rabbits play,
New components hop in, brightening the day.
With imports tidied and functions refined,
Our code's now clearer, beautifully aligned.
So let’s celebrate with a joyful cheer,
For a cleaner codebase, we hold so dear! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
packages/extension-polkagate/src/fullscreen/homeFullScreen/partials/AccountIdenticonIconsFS.tsx (1)

4-5: Consider removing the ESLint disable comment.

Instead of disabling the ESLint rule, consider formatting the JSX props to comply with the rule. This helps maintain consistent code style across the project.

packages/extension-polkagate/src/fullscreen/homeFullScreen/partials/AccountBodyFs.tsx (1)

4-6: Consider removing ESLint disable directives by formatting props properly.

Instead of disabling ESLint rules, consider formatting the JSX props to comply with the project's style guidelines. This will maintain consistency with the codebase's formatting standards.

packages/extension-polkagate/src/fullscreen/homeFullScreen/partials/AccountInformationForHome.tsx (2)

148-155: Consider extracting the magic number into a constant

The gridSize prop of 5.6 passed to AccountBodyFs appears to be a magic number. Consider extracting this into a named constant to improve code maintainability and document its purpose.

+const ACCOUNT_BODY_GRID_SIZE = 5.6; // Add comment explaining this value
+
 <AccountBodyFs
   address={address}
   goToDetails={goToDetails}
-  gridSize={5.6}
+  gridSize={ACCOUNT_BODY_GRID_SIZE}
 />

Line range hint 128-133: Improve error handling in onAssetBoxClicked

The current error handling only logs to console, which might miss important errors. Consider implementing proper error handling and user feedback.

 const onAssetBoxClicked = useCallback((asset: FetchedBalance | undefined) => {
   address && asset && tieAccount(address, asset.genesisHash as HexString).finally(() => {
     setSelectedAsset(asset);
-  }).catch(console.error);
+  }).catch((error: Error) => {
+    console.error('Failed to tie account:', error);
+    // Consider showing a user-friendly error notification
+    // Example: showErrorNotification(t('Failed to update account settings'));
+  });
 }, [address, setSelectedAsset]);
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e4a22ac and ceb6465.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • packages/extension-polkagate/src/components/ShortAddress2.tsx (2 hunks)
  • packages/extension-polkagate/src/fullscreen/accountDetails/components/AccountInformationForDetails.tsx (3 hunks)
  • packages/extension-polkagate/src/fullscreen/homeFullScreen/partials/AccountBodyFs.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/extension-polkagate/src/fullscreen/homeFullScreen/partials/AccountIdenticonIconsFS.tsx (1 hunks)
  • packages/extension-polkagate/src/fullscreen/homeFullScreen/partials/AccountInformationForHome.tsx (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
packages/extension-polkagate/src/fullscreen/homeFullScreen/partials/AccountIdenticonIconsFS.tsx (2)

40-40: LGTM! Good use of memoization.

The use of React.memo is appropriate here since the component receives simple props and renders potentially expensive child components.


17-21: Consider adding error handling for hook failures.

The useInfo and useIdentity hooks might fail to fetch data. Consider adding error handling and loading states.

packages/extension-polkagate/src/components/ShortAddress2.tsx (2)

6-7: LGTM! Clean import organization.

The type import is properly separated and follows good import ordering conventions.


23-23: Verify the impact of parameter reordering.

While the reordering follows a logical pattern, this change could affect other components using named parameters.

Let's verify all usages of ShortAddress2 to ensure they use named parameters:

✅ Verification successful

Parameter reordering is safe - all usages employ named parameters

The verification shows that all instances of ShortAddress2 in the codebase use named parameters:

  • AccountBrief.tsx: <ShortAddress2 address={formatted} charsCount={19} style={{ ... }} />
  • AccountBodyFs.tsx: <ShortAddress2 address={formatted || address} charsCount={40} style={{ ... }} />

Since all usages employ named parameters rather than positional arguments, the reordering of parameters in the function signature is non-breaking.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all ShortAddress2 component usages
# Expect: All usages should use named parameters to avoid breaking changes

# Search for ShortAddress2 component usage
rg -A 3 '<ShortAddress2' packages/extension-polkagate/src/

Length of output: 1136

packages/extension-polkagate/src/fullscreen/homeFullScreen/partials/AccountBodyFs.tsx (2)

76-76: LGTM! Proper memoization implemented.

The use of React.memo is appropriate here as it can prevent unnecessary re-renders when parent components update.


35-74: Consider adding error boundaries and loading states.

The component directly uses API data without handling potential loading or error states. This could lead to runtime errors if the API calls fail.

Let's check if error boundaries are implemented in parent components:

Consider implementing:

  1. Loading states while API data is being fetched
  2. Error handling for failed API calls
  3. Error boundaries if not already present in parent components
packages/extension-polkagate/src/fullscreen/homeFullScreen/partials/AccountInformationForHome.tsx (2)

19-19: LGTM: Import changes are well-organized

The import modifications align well with the component refactoring, introducing new components while removing unused ones.

Also applies to: 21-21, 30-31


99-99: Verify that all required properties are handled by new components

The switch from useInfo to useAccount simplifies the hook usage, but we should verify that the removed properties (api, chain, formatted, genesisHash) are properly handled by the new components.

✅ Verification successful

The removed properties are still available through useInfo in both components

The verification shows that both AccountBodyFs and AccountIdenticonIconsFS components are already using the useInfo hook to access the removed properties (api, chain, formatted, genesisHash). This confirms that the properties are properly handled by the new components and the switch to useAccount in AccountInformationForHome is a valid simplification since it only needs the account data.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of removed properties in the new components
echo "Checking AccountBodyFs for handling of removed properties..."
rg -A 5 "api|chain|formatted|genesisHash" "packages/extension-polkagate/src/fullscreen/homeFullScreen/partials/AccountBodyFs.tsx"

echo "Checking AccountIdenticonIconsFS for handling of removed properties..."
rg -A 5 "api|chain|formatted|genesisHash" "packages/extension-polkagate/src/fullscreen/homeFullScreen/partials/AccountIdenticonIconsFS.tsx"

Length of output: 1962

packages/extension-polkagate/src/fullscreen/accountDetails/components/AccountInformationForDetails.tsx (3)

11-11: LGTM! Import changes align with refactoring goals.

The removal of UI component imports and addition of new component imports (AccountBodyFs, AccountIdenticonIconsFS) reflects good code organization by moving reused functionality into dedicated components.

Also applies to: 14-16, 21-22


Line range hint 26-143: LGTM! Well-structured helper components with proper TypeScript usage.

The helper components demonstrate good practices:

  • Strong TypeScript typing with interfaces
  • Proper loading state handling with skeletons
  • Good error boundary handling for undefined/null states
  • Effective use of memoization

153-153: Verify identity handling after hook removal.

While the refactoring to use AccountIdenticonIconsFS and AccountBodyFs looks good, please verify:

  1. The removal of useIdentity hook doesn't affect identity information display
  2. All necessary props are being passed to the new components

Let's verify the identity handling:

Also applies to: 204-208

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about these components and identity handling.


Let me check the implementation of these components in their actual location.


Identity handling is properly maintained after refactoring

The identity information is correctly handled in both new components:

  1. AccountBodyFs uses useIdentity hook and passes the identity info to the Identity component
  2. AccountIdenticonIconsFS also uses useIdentity hook and passes the identity info to AccountIconsFs

The refactoring has properly distributed the identity handling responsibilities, maintaining all functionality while improving component composition. No issues found with the removal of useIdentity from AccountInformationForDetails.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if identity handling is properly moved to the new components

# Check AccountBodyFs implementation for identity handling
echo "Checking AccountBodyFs for identity handling..."
ast-grep --pattern 'function AccountBodyFs($props) {
  $$$
  useIdentity($$$)
  $$$
}'

# Check AccountIdenticonIconsFS implementation
echo "Checking AccountIdenticonIconsFS for identity handling..."
ast-grep --pattern 'function AccountIdenticonIconsFS($props) {
  $$$
  useIdentity($$$)
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 417


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation and usage of these components

# Find AccountBodyFs implementation
echo "=== AccountBodyFs implementation ==="
rg -A 10 "export (default )?function AccountBodyFs" 

# Find AccountIdenticonIconsFS implementation
echo "=== AccountIdenticonIconsFS implementation ==="
rg -A 10 "export (default )?function AccountIdenticonIconsFS"

# Check if identity is handled elsewhere in the component hierarchy
echo "=== Checking for identity usage in parent components ==="
rg "useIdentity.*address" -A 5

# Check imports in AccountInformationForDetails
echo "=== Checking imports in AccountInformationForDetails ==="
rg "import.*AccountBodyFs|import.*AccountIdenticonIconsFS" packages/extension-polkagate/src/fullscreen/accountDetails/components/AccountInformationForDetails.tsx

Length of output: 912


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of components in the homeFullScreen/partials directory

echo "=== AccountBodyFs implementation ==="
cat packages/extension-polkagate/src/fullscreen/homeFullScreen/partials/AccountBodyFs.tsx

echo -e "\n=== AccountIdenticonIconsFS implementation ==="
cat packages/extension-polkagate/src/fullscreen/homeFullScreen/partials/AccountIdenticonIconsFS.tsx

# Also check if there's any identity handling in the parent component
echo -e "\n=== AccountInformationForDetails implementation ==="
cat packages/extension-polkagate/src/fullscreen/accountDetails/components/AccountInformationForDetails.tsx

Length of output: 14217

Comment on lines +13 to +15
interface Props {
address: string | undefined;
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider making the address prop required and more strictly typed.

Since this component is meant to display account information, the address should probably be required. Also, consider using a more specific type for the address string (e.g., a type that ensures it's a valid substrate address).

 interface Props {
-  address: string | undefined;
+  address: string;
 }

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants