Skip to content

Replace script #3281

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

VanshikaSabharwal
Copy link

@VanshikaSabharwal VanshikaSabharwal commented Feb 22, 2025

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

bugfix, feature

Issue Number:

Fixes #3243
Snapshots/Videos:

Screencast.from.2025-02-23.02-43-44.webm

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

Summary

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

Checklist

CodeRabbit AI Review

  • I have reviewed and addressed all critical issues flagged by CodeRabbit AI
  • I have implemented or provided justification for each non-critical suggestion
  • I have documented my reasoning in the PR comments where CodeRabbit AI suggestions were not implemented

Test Coverage

  • I have written tests for all new changes/features
  • I have verified that test coverage meets or exceeds 95%
  • I have run the test suite locally and all tests pass

Other information

Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Updated the JWT token configuration to generate a secure, random token instead of relying on a preset value.
    • Introduced an automated process that replaces a placeholder in the configuration with a newly generated token for enhanced security.
    • Added a new script to handle the token replacement process during service startup.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 22, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces an entrypoint directive for the api service in the compose.yaml file, specifying that the service should execute the replaceJwt.sh script upon startup. Additionally, a new shell script, replaceJwt.sh, is added to generate a random JWT-like token and replace a placeholder in various environment files with this token. The environment variable API_JWT_SECRET is updated to a placeholder value across multiple .env files, indicating a shift from hardcoded secrets to runtime-generated values.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
compose.yaml Added entrypoint: ["/bin/sh", "-c", "replaceJwt.sh"] for the api service to execute the replaceJwt.sh script on startup.
replaceJwt.sh New script added that generates a sanitized random JWT-like token and replaces the REPLACE_WITH_RANDOM_JWT_TOKEN placeholder in environment files.
envFiles/.env.ci Updated API_JWT_SECRET from a specific JWT secret to REPLACE_WITH_RANDOM_JWT_TOKEN.
envFiles/.env.deploy Updated API_JWT_SECRET from a specific JWT secret to REPLACE_WITH_RANDOM_JWT_TOKEN.
envFiles/.env.devcontainer Updated API_JWT_SECRET from a specific JWT secret to REPLACE_WITH_RANDOM_JWT_TOKEN.
envFiles/.env.production Updated API_JWT_SECRET from empty to REPLACE_WITH_RANDOM_JWT_TOKEN.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant S as replaceJwt.sh
    participant D as Compose File
    U->>S: Execute replaceJwt.sh
    S->>S: Generate random JWT token using openssl
    S->>D: Replace placeholder using sed with generated token
    D-->>S: Confirm update
    S->>U: Output success message
Loading

Suggested labels

ignore-sensitive-files-pr

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 378c13d and 2e1d95b.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • compose.yaml (1 hunks)
  • replaceJwt.sh (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
replaceJwt.sh (2)

1-2: Shebang and initial setup look good.
The script correctly starts with the bash shebang and includes a blank line for readability.


12-13: Success message is clear.
The echo statement confirms the operation's success. It may be useful to incorporate this into a logging system if the script becomes more complex.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
replaceJwt.sh (2)

4-7: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance Error Handling for File Existence and Token Generation
Before proceeding with token replacement, it is important to verify that the file defined by COMPOSE_FILE exists and that the token generation was successful.

Consider applying the following diff:

 # Define the path to the compose file
-COMPOSE_FILE="./.env"
+COMPOSE_FILE="./.env"
+if [ ! -f "$COMPOSE_FILE" ]; then
+  echo "Error: Compose file not found at $COMPOSE_FILE"
+  exit 1
+fi
 # Generate a random JWT-like token (modify this logic if needed)
-RANDOM_TOKEN=$(openssl rand -base64 32 | tr -d '=+/')
+RANDOM_TOKEN=$(openssl rand -base64 32 | tr -d '=+/')
+if [ -z "$RANDOM_TOKEN" ]; then
+  echo "Error: Failed to generate random token."
+  exit 1
+fi

10-10: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Verify Successful Token Replacement with sed
After executing the sed command, check its exit status to ensure that the placeholder was correctly replaced in the file.

Consider applying the following diff:

-sed -i "s/REPLACE_WITH_RANDOM_JWT_TOKEN/$RANDOM_TOKEN/g" "$COMPOSE_FILE"
+sed -i "s/REPLACE_WITH_RANDOM_JWT_TOKEN/$RANDOM_TOKEN/g" "$COMPOSE_FILE"
+if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
+  echo "Error: Failed to replace token in $COMPOSE_FILE"
+  exit 1
+fi
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2e1d95b and 535e78f.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • compose.yaml (1 hunks)
  • envFiles/.env.ci (1 hunks)
  • envFiles/.env.deploy (1 hunks)
  • envFiles/.env.devcontainer (1 hunks)
  • envFiles/.env.production (1 hunks)
  • replaceJwt.sh (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
compose.yaml

[error] 22-22: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
envFiles/.env.production (1)

23-23: Consistent JWT Secret Placeholder Update
Updating API_JWT_SECRET to REPLACE_WITH_RANDOM_JWT_TOKEN aligns with the new runtime token generation approach. Please ensure that the replaceJwt.sh script runs before the application starts so that an actual secret is in place.

envFiles/.env.ci (1)

23-23: Environment Variable Update Verified
The update of API_JWT_SECRET to REPLACE_WITH_RANDOM_JWT_TOKEN is consistent with the overall strategy of dynamically generating the JWT secret during startup.

envFiles/.env.deploy (1)

33-33: Deployment Configuration Consistency
Changing API_JWT_SECRET to REPLACE_WITH_RANDOM_JWT_TOKEN ensures that the deployment process will later inject a dynamically generated token. This is consistent with the changes in other environment files.

envFiles/.env.devcontainer (1)

25-25: Development Container Environment Update
The update to set API_JWT_SECRET to REPLACE_WITH_RANDOM_JWT_TOKEN in the devcontainer file is appropriate. Be sure that the container’s startup process executes replaceJwt.sh so that the placeholder is replaced with a valid token.

@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ services:
dockerfile: ./docker/api.Containerfile
# https://docs.docker.com/reference/compose-file/build/#target
target: production

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Remove trailing spaces.

Static analysis reported trailing spaces on this line. Please remove any extraneous whitespace to adhere to YAML formatting standards.

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 22-22: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@
dockerfile: ./docker/api.Containerfile
# https://docs.docker.com/reference/compose-file/build/#target
target: production

entrypoint: ["/bin/sh", "-c", "replaceJwt.sh"]
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Review the new entrypoint directive.

The addition of the entrypoint directive:

entrypoint: ["/bin/sh", "-c", "replaceJwt.sh"]

ensures that the replaceJwt.sh script runs when the api service starts. Please verify the following:

  • The replaceJwt.sh script exists in the repository root, is executable (with the correct shebang), and has proper error handling.
  • The script correctly replaces the REPLACE_WITH_RANDOM_JWT_TOKEN placeholder in your environment files.
  • The script eventually hands over control to the main application process (e.g., via an exec command) so that the container’s PID 1 is properly managed.

If you need assistance in enhancing or verifying the script’s behavior, please let me know.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant