-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
Test: src/graphql/types/Organization/creator.ts #3196
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Test: src/graphql/types/Organization/creator.ts #3196
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a comprehensive suite of tests for the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts (1)
1-443
: Well-implemented test suite with comprehensive coverage!The test implementation is thorough and well-structured, covering all major scenarios including authentication, authorization, error handling, and edge cases. The code demonstrates good use of TypeScript features and testing best practices.
@coderabbitai full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 7
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts
[error] 106-106: Formatter would have printed the following content: avatarMimeType: 'image/avif' | 'image/jpeg' | 'image/png' | 'image/webp' | null
[error] 175-175: Formatter would have printed the following content: } as Partial<Pick<FastifyInstance, 'addHook' | 'decorate' | 'get' | 'post'>>
[error] 226-226: Formatter would have printed the following content: // Early return if organization has no creator
[error] 381-381: Formatter would have printed the following content: await expect(async () => {
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts (2)
40-41
: Double-check difference between system user role and membership role
The user role is restricted to"administrator" | "regular"
, while membership roles include"administrator" | "regular" | "member"
. This might be intentional, but please verify that an additional"member"
user role isn't required, or confirm that the mismatch is expected.Also applies to: 70-73
200-215
: Query logic is clear and robust
The usage ofeq
from Drizzle ORM to retrieve the current user is straightforward and appears correct.
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts
[error] 180-180: Formatter would have printed the following content: Incorrect formatting in code. Please adjust quotes from single to double.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts (5)
65-66
: Ensure type consistency betweenUser
andUserFromDB
.The
avatarMimeType
field has different type definitions. This inconsistency could lead to type safety issues when converting between the two types.- avatarMimeType: string | null; + avatarMimeType: "image/avif" | "image/jpeg" | "image/png" | "image/webp" | null;
120-155
: Consider more flexible user mocking.
createCompleteMockUser
currently returns a user object with largely fixed fields. If additional variations are needed (for example, custom addresses or phone numbers), accepting optional overrides for any field might simplify test maintenance and readability.
380-396
: Test case for non-member user looks good.Thanks for implementing a dedicated test for the case where the user has no organization membership. This ensures proper authorization checks within the resolver.
190-270
: Overall,resolveCreator
function appears robust.Your approach to authentication, membership checks, and error handling is thoroughly covered. Returning
null
for missing creator IDs and handling unexpected scenarios with explicit error messages ensures maintainable and reliable logic.
180-180
:⚠️ Potential issueFix pipeline formatting error.
The pipeline indicates that the quotes should be adjusted from single to double to maintain project-wide consistency. This discrepancy causes a formatting failure.
Apply this diff to fix the quotes:
-} as Partial<Pick<FastifyInstance, 'addHook' | 'decorate' | 'get' | 'post'>>, +} as Partial<Pick<FastifyInstance, "addHook" | "decorate" | "get" | "post">>,Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
[error] 180-180: Formatter would have printed the following content: Incorrect formatting in code. Please adjust quotes from single to double.
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts (3)
202-206
: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Use a more type-safe approach for mocking FastifyReply.
Similar to the FastifyInstance mock, the FastifyReply mock uses type assertion that bypasses TypeScript's type checking.
Apply this diff to create a partial mock that implements only the required methods:
- reply: { - code: vi.fn(), - send: vi.fn(), - header: vi.fn(), - } as unknown as FastifyReply, + reply: { + code: vi.fn(), + send: vi.fn(), + header: vi.fn(), + } as Partial<Pick<FastifyReply, 'code' | 'send' | 'header'>>,
192-201
: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Use a more type-safe approach for mocking FastifyInstance.
The current implementation uses type assertion (
as unknown as FastifyInstance
), which bypasses TypeScript's type checking.Apply this diff to create a partial mock that implements only the required methods:
- app: { - addHook: vi.fn(), - decorate: vi.fn(), - get: vi.fn(), - post: vi.fn(), - server: {} as FastifyInstance["server"], - pluginName: "", - prefix: "", - version: "", - } as unknown as FastifyInstance, + app: { + addHook: vi.fn(), + decorate: vi.fn(), + get: vi.fn(), + post: vi.fn(), + server: {} as FastifyInstance["server"], + pluginName: "", + prefix: "", + version: "", + } as Partial<Pick<FastifyInstance, 'addHook' | 'decorate' | 'get' | 'post' | 'server' | 'pluginName' | 'prefix' | 'version'>>,
58-90
: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Consider using a more specific type for
avatarMimeType
.The
User
interface definesavatarMimeType
asstring | null
, whileUserFromDB
defines it with specific MIME types. This inconsistency could lead to type safety issues.Apply this diff to align the types:
- avatarMimeType: string | null; + avatarMimeType: "image/avif" | "image/jpeg" | "image/png" | "image/webp" | null;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts
[warning] 1-1: Import statements could be sorted.
[warning] 3-3: Formatter would have printed the following content.
[error] 1-1: Some errors were emitted while running checks.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts (1)
320-473
: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage.The test suite provides excellent coverage of various scenarios:
- Authentication checks
- Authorization for different user roles
- Error handling for missing users
- Edge cases like organizations without creators
- Multiple organization memberships
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
@palisadoes ready for review |
@palisadoes please review this |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The code coverage report is showing no change. Please fix.
This is a new test file created before testing for src/graphql/types/Organization/creator.ts was unavailable. |
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
The report is still showing no coverage |
let me check again can you please assign me talawa-admin issue#3565 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/graphql/types/Organization/creator.ts
(1 hunks)test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
test/graphql/types/Organization/creator.test.ts (5)
23-30
: Provide flexible overrides in yourMockUser
type for better test coverage.
This type is currently formed with fixed fields. Consider allowing optional overrides (e.g., optional address or phone fields) if future tests need more varied user data.
32-144
: Authentication & Authorization tests are robust.
All critical paths—unauthenticated, unauthorized, system admin, and organization admin—are tested thoroughly. Great use of mock data to validate different role scenarios.
146-190
: Creator retrieval tests successfully cover null creator and missing creator user cases.
Returningnull
whencreatorId
is null aligns with best practices for GraphQL. The logic for throwing an unexpected error when the user is missing ensures data integrity checks.
191-224
: Error handling tests comprehensively address database errors.
Both connection failures and timeouts are handled, ensuring robust coverage of potential runtime exceptions.
225-374
: Concurrent access tests effectively confirm organization data integrity.
Validation includes empty results and race condition-like scenarios. The inclusion of log statements to warn about unexpected states is beneficial for debugging.src/graphql/types/Organization/creator.ts (2)
7-97
: Guard against undefinedctx.currentClient.user
whenisAuthenticated
is true.
AlthoughisAuthenticated
usually implies a user exists, consider a safety check or assertion in caseuser
is unexpectedly null or missing.For example:
if (!ctx.currentClient.isAuthenticated || !ctx.currentClient.user) { throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ extensions: { code: "unauthenticated", }, }); }
98-106
: Field implementation is clear and consistent with theOrganizationCreatorResolver
.
Definingcreator
as a separate resolver fosters modularity and supports thorough unit testing. No further changes needed here.
@palisadoes please review this PRs |
@palisadoes please review |
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3196 +/- ##
====================================================
+ Coverage 43.68% 43.90% +0.21%
====================================================
Files 455 455
Lines 33628 33644 +16
Branches 647 664 +17
====================================================
+ Hits 14692 14772 +80
+ Misses 18932 18868 -64
Partials 4 4 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
51c11d2
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Test Implementation and Code Quality Enhancement
Issue Number:
Fixes #3071
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
No documentation update required as this is a test implementation.
Summary
Implementation of unit tests for the organization creator field resolver
Coverage of authentication and authorization scenarios
Testing of edge cases and error handling
Proper typing of test context objects to improve code quality
Implementation of mocking strategies for database interactions
These tests ensure the robust functionality of the venue creator resolver while maintaining high code quality standards.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Checklist
CodeRabbit AI Review
Test Coverage
Other information
Have you read the [contributing guide](https://github.com/PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
Tests
Let me know if you need any modifications! 🚀
Summary by CodeRabbit