Skip to content

fixed :#2841 NoMongo: Create an equivalent sample database for importation by the setup script #3157

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

gurramkarthiknetha
Copy link

@gurramkarthiknetha gurramkarthiknetha commented Feb 6, 2025

What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Feature: Recreate sample PostgreSQL database for the develop-postgres branch.

Issue Number:
Fixes #2841

Snapshots/Videos:
N/A

If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Yes, updated INSTALLATION.md with user information.

Summary
This PR recreates a sample PostgreSQL database for the develop-postgres branch, ensuring compatibility with the setup script. It includes:

  • Migration of users, posts, organizations, and events from the MongoDB sample database.
  • Creation of individual repeated events for 2025, as the new API does not support recurring events yet.
  • Ensuring the monthly, weekly, and daily calendar for 2025 matches the develop branch implementation.
  • Coordination with the assignee of issue NoMongo: Create a .env file setup script #2840 for .env file setup.
  • Documentation updates in INSTALLATION.md.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No

Checklist

CodeRabbit AI Review

  • I have reviewed and addressed all critical issues flagged by CodeRabbit AI
  • I have implemented or provided justification for each non-critical suggestion
  • I have documented my reasoning in the PR comments where CodeRabbit AI suggestions were not implemented

Test Coverage

  • I have written tests for all new changes/features
  • I have verified that test coverage meets or exceeds 95%
  • I have run the test suite locally and all tests pass

Other information
N/A

Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores

    • Updated dependencies, developer tools, and build scripts to enhance overall system stability and performance.
  • Refactor

    • Streamlined environment configuration to ensure smooth data loading.
    • Simplified the data import process with clearer messaging and improved error handling.
    • Updated paths for loading sample data files to reflect a new directory structure.
  • New Features

    • Introduced new scripts for starting Drizzle Studio and setup processes.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 6, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the project’s dependency and script configuration in package.json and refines the sample data loading process in src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts. The changes include adding several new packages (including Docusaurus packages, testing libraries, and type definitions), updating and downgrading some dependencies, and adding new script commands. In addition, the sample data loader has been modified to use environment variables via dotenv, update the data directory path, improve JSON file filtering, and simplify logging and error handling.

Changes

File(s) Summary of Changes
package.json - Added new dependencies: @docusaurus/core, @docusaurus/preset-classic, @docusaurus/theme-classic, @docusaurus/tsconfig, @docusaurus/types, inquirer, prism-react-renderer
- Updated/downgraded dependencies like drizzle-orm and drizzle-seed
- Added new devDependencies (@types/jest, @types/react, jest, jest-extended, ts-jest)
- Modified package manager version and introduced new scripts (start_drizzle_studio, setup, export:data)
src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts - Introduced dotenv.config() for environment variable management
- Changed sample data directory path from ../../sample_data to ../../scripts
- Adjusted logic to filter JSON files based on file extension
- Simplified logging and error handling while streamlining JSON parsing

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant S as Setup Script
    participant L as loadSampleData.ts
    participant FS as File System
    participant DB as Database
    participant D as Dotenv

    S->>L: Initiate sample data loading
    L->>D: Call dotenv.config()
    L->>FS: Read files from '../../scripts'
    FS-->>L: Return list of files
    L->>L: Filter and parse .json files
    L->>DB: Insert documents into collections
    DB-->>L: Confirm insertion
    L->>S: Return success message
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Create an equivalent sample database for importation by the setup script (#2841)

Possibly related PRs

  • fixed loadSampleData.ts and added tests  #2807 – The changes in the main PR regarding the src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts file focus on updating paths and improving error handling, while the retrieved PR modifies the same file to enhance path resolution and export the listSampleData function, indicating a direct relationship in their modifications.

Suggested labels

ignore-sensitive-files-pr

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes

Tip

🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
  • We have enabled web search-based reviews and chat for all users. This feature allows CodeRabbit to access the latest documentation and information on the web.
  • You can disable this feature by setting web_search: false in the knowledge_base settings.
  • Please share any feedback in the Discord discussion.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2025

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts (1)

165-192: Add date validation for events.

While the event data migration looks good, consider adding these validations:

  1. Ensure start date is before end date
  2. Validate that dates are within 2025 (as per PR objectives)
  3. Check for potential overlapping events
 const events = documents.map((event: EventType) => {
+	const startDate = new Date(event.startAt || new Date());
+	const endDate = new Date(event.endAt || new Date());
+	
+	if (startDate > endDate) {
+		throw new Error(`Invalid date range for event ${event.name}: start date is after end date`);
+	}
+	
+	if (startDate.getFullYear() !== 2025 || endDate.getFullYear() !== 2025) {
+		throw new Error(`Invalid year for event ${event.name}: all events must be in 2025`);
+	}
+	
 	return {
 		...event,
 		id: uuidv4(),
 		name: event.name,
 		description: event.description,
 		createdAt: event.createdAt ? new Date(event.createdAt) : new Date(),
 		updatedAt: event.updatedAt ? new Date(event.updatedAt) : new Date(),
-		startAt: event.startAt ? new Date(event.startAt) : new Date(),
-		endAt: event.endAt ? new Date(event.endAt) : new Date(),
+		startAt: startDate,
+		endAt: endDate,
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4eff18b and 60e1ec4.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • package.json (5 hunks)
  • src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts (8 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts (2)

4-4: LGTM! Environment configuration is properly set up.

The addition of dotenv configuration is appropriate for managing PostgreSQL connection parameters.

Also applies to: 10-10


96-141: LGTM! Robust implementation of user and organization data migration.

The implementation correctly handles:

  • UUID generation for IDs
  • Unique constraints (email addresses, organization names)
  • Foreign key relationships between users and organizations
  • Date conversions
package.json (3)

109-112: LGTM! Scripts are properly configured.

The new scripts align well with the PR objectives:

  • setup: For initial configuration
  • import:sample-data: For importing PostgreSQL sample data
  • export:data: For exporting data to JSON

24-24: Verify compatibility of downgraded packages.

The following packages have been downgraded:

  • drizzle-orm: ^0.39.1 → ^0.38.4
  • drizzle-seed: ^0.3.1 → ^0.3.0

Also applies to: 55-55

✅ Verification successful

🌐 Web query:

Are there any breaking changes or known issues between drizzle-orm 0.38.4 and 0.39.1?

💡 Result:

When upgrading from Drizzle ORM 0.38.4 to 0.39.1, there are several breaking changes and known issues to consider:

### Breaking Changes
1. **Bun SQL Driver Compatibility**  
   - Requires Bun v1.2+ but has unresolved concurrency issues for simultaneous queries[1][9].  
   - Limited type handling:  
     - `json`/`jsonb` inserts/selects require manual `JSON.stringify`[1].  
     - `datetime`, `date`, and `timestamp` types fail in `mode: string`[1].  
     - Array types may malfunction[1].

2. **Drizzle-Kit Version Lock**  
   - Drizzle-Kit must be updated to **0.30.x** (e.g., 0.30.4) to avoid errors like `This version of drizzle-kit requires newer version of drizzle-orm`[4][5]. Earlier versions (e.g., 0.28.x) are incompatible with ORM ≥0.39.x.

3. **CTE (WITH Clause) Syntax**  
   - `WITH` now supports `INSERT`, `UPDATE`, `DELETE`, and raw SQL templates, requiring syntax adjustments for existing CTE queries[1].

### Known Issues
| Issue | Description | Source |  
|-------|-------------|--------|  
| **Bun SQL Driver Limitations** | JSON/array handling requires workarounds; datetime parsing broken | [1][9] |  
| **Drizzle-Zod Compatibility** | Schema generation may produce nullable fields in v0.6.x (fixed via type coercion)[10] | [10] |  
| **SingleStore Migrations** | Schema changes may require table recreation for older schemas[5] | [5] |  

For migrations, ensure **[email protected]** is paired with **[email protected]**, and test Bun SQL integrations thoroughly due to unresolved driver limitations[1][4][9].

Citations:

- 1: https://github.com/drizzle-team/drizzle-orm/releases
- 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDjZOZ1Hgf8
- 3: https://github.com/drizzle-team/drizzle-orm/issues/2418
- 4: https://github.com/drizzle-team/drizzle-orm/issues/3578
- 5: https://newreleases.io/project/github/drizzle-team/drizzle-orm/release/[email protected]
- 6: https://orm.drizzle.team/docs/latest-releases
- 7: https://orm.drizzle.team/docs/overview
- 8: https://orm.drizzle.team/docs/latest-releases/drizzle-orm-v0290
- 9: https://newreleases.io/project/npm/drizzle-orm/release/0.39.0
- 10: https://www.answeroverflow.com/m/1318734467082354689

Downgrade Validated
The downgrade from drizzle-orm 0.39.1 to 0.38.4 avoids the breaking changes introduced in v0.39.1—such as Bun SQL driver compatibility issues, type handling adjustments, enforced drizzle-kit upgrades, and CTE syntax changes—thereby maintaining compatibility with our existing code. Similar reasoning applies to the drizzle-seed downgrade.


7-11: Verify the necessity of Docusaurus packages.

These packages seem unrelated to the PR's objective of creating a sample PostgreSQL database:

  • @docusaurus/* packages
  • prism-react-renderer

Also applies to: 37-37

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2025

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts (1)

35-36: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Add directory existence validation and improve error handling

Consider adding a check to verify that the sampleDataPath exists before attempting to read it. This will enhance error handling for scenarios such as the directory not being found.

Apply this diff to add the validation:

 try {
    const sampleDataPath = path.resolve(dirname, "../../scripts");
+   const pathExists = await fs.access(sampleDataPath).then(() => true).catch(() => false);
+   if (!pathExists) {
+       throw new Error(`Sample data directory not found: ${sampleDataPath}`);
+   }
    const files = await fs.readdir(sampleDataPath);
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 60e1ec4 and 83c140a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts (8 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts (3)

4-4: Approved: Correct usage of dotenv for environment variables

The addition of the dotenv package and initializing it with dotenv.config() is a good practice for managing environment variables.

Also applies to: 10-10


41-45: Simplified file filtering and logging looks good

The update to filter files by .json extension and the simplification of the logging format improves readability.


205-212: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Review process exit handling and error management

The current implementation may lead to confusion in exit codes and error handling:

  • process.exit(1) is called in the catch block when an error occurs.
  • process.exit(0) is called after the finally block, which might execute regardless of errors.

Consider adjusting the placement of process.exit(0) and ensuring that queryClient.end() is called correctly, to prevent masking errors and maintain consistent exit behavior.

Apply this diff to improve the exit handling:

     } catch (error) {
         console.error("Failed to import sample data:", error);
+        await queryClient.end().catch(console.error);
         process.exit(1);
     } finally {
-        await queryClient.end().catch(console.error);
     }
-    process.exit(0);
+    console.log("\nTables populated successfully");
+    await queryClient.end().catch(console.error);
+    process.exit(0);

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2025

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2025

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Feb 6, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2025

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 83c140a and 5ca1292.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (6 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (16)
package.json (16)

23-24: Environment and ORM Dependency Update.
The addition of "dotenv": "^16.4.7" supports managing environment variables, and the downgrade of "drizzle-orm" to ^0.38.4 appears to address compatibility concerns. Ensure these version adjustments resolve any related issues without introducing regressions elsewhere.


49-49: Type Definitions for Inquirer.
Adding "@types/inquirer": "^9.0.7" improves TypeScript support for inquirer. This is a good addition for improved developer experience.


50-50: Type Definitions for Jest.
The new dependency "@types/jest": "^29.5.14" enhances type safety for Jest tests. Make sure your tests are updated accordingly.


51-51: Updated Node Type Definitions.
Upgrading "@types/node" to version ^22.13.0 aligns with the engine requirements listed in the project. Please verify that the change is fully compatible with your current Node environment.


52-52: Type Definitions for React.
The inclusion of "@types/react": "^18.3.18" supports React-based components. Confirm that this addition is relevant for the repository, particularly if React is used in any frontend or visualization components.


54-54: Biome Dependency for Code Quality.
Adding "biome": "^0.3.3" helps enforce code quality standards. Make sure its integration within the project’s quality check scripts performs as expected.


56-56: Drizzle-Seed Downgrade.
The version of "drizzle-seed" has been downgraded to ^0.3.0. This change likely addresses compatibility issues with the database seeding process. Please revalidate the seeding functionality after this change.


58-58: Jest Testing Framework Added.
Introducing "jest": "^29.7.0" for testing purposes is a positive move. Ensure that the test runner and configurations are updated to leverage this version.


59-59: Jest Extended Library Added.
The dependency "jest-extended": "^4.0.2" provides additional Jest matchers, enhancing the testing assertions. Confirm that your tests utilize these extended assertions as needed.


63-63: TS-Jest for TypeScript Testing.
Adding "ts-jest": "^29.2.5" assists in running TypeScript tests with Jest. Verify that the configuration for ts-jest is properly set up in your project.


82-82: Package Manager Version Update.
The packageManager has been updated to "[email protected]" from the previous version. This deliberate downgrade might be addressing specific compatibility requirements. Ensure that all contributors are informed about and using this version for consistency.


91-91: Updated Code Quality Check Script.
The "check_code_quality" script now invokes pnpm biome check --error-on-warnings. Confirm that this change fits your CI/CD setup and that the biome tool is correctly installed as a dependency.


104-104: Drizzle Studio Script Added.
The addition of the "start_drizzle_studio": "drizzle-kit studio" script provides a convenient way to launch the Drizzle Studio UI. Verify that drizzle-kit is correctly configured and that the studio launches without issues.


111-111: Import Sample Data Script Reintroduced.
The "import:sample-data": "tsx ./src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts" script reintroduces the sample data import command with an updated path. Please confirm that the new file location and import logic function correctly.


112-112: Upgrade Drizzle Metadata Script.
The "upgrade_drizzle_metadata": "drizzle-kit up" command now manages the upgrade of Drizzle’s metadata. Validate that this change synchronizes with your database migration strategy and updates metadata as intended.


113-113: Export Data Script Added.
The new script "export:data": "tsx ./scripts/convertToJson.ts" facilitates exporting data to JSON. Ensure that the generated output meets the expected format and that the conversion logic is robust.

Comment on lines +7 to +11
"@docusaurus/core": "^3.7.0",
"@docusaurus/preset-classic": "^3.7.0",
"@docusaurus/theme-classic": "^3.7.0",
"@docusaurus/tsconfig": "^3.7.0",
"@docusaurus/types": "^3.7.0",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Docusaurus Dependencies Added.
The new Docusaurus dependencies (@docusaurus/core, @docusaurus/preset-classic, @docusaurus/theme-classic, @docusaurus/tsconfig, and @docusaurus/types) have been introduced at version ^3.7.0. Please verify whether these packages are required in the production bundle or if they can be moved to devDependencies to reduce the production footprint.

"drizzle-zod": "0.6.1",
"env-schema": "^6.0.1",
"fastify": "^5.2.1",
"fastify-plugin": "^5.0.1",
"graphql": "^16.10.0",
"graphql-scalars": "^1.24.0",
"graphql-upload-minimal": "^1.6.1",
"inquirer": "^12.3.2",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Inquirer Dependency Added.
The inclusion of "inquirer": "^12.3.2" provides support for interactive CLI operations. Consider confirming whether this dependency is needed in production or if it should be listed under devDependencies when its usage is limited to scripts or development-time interactions.

"mercurius": "^16.0.1",
"mercurius-upload": "^8.0.0",
"minio": "^8.0.4",
"postgres": "^3.4.5",
"prism-react-renderer": "^2.4.1",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Prism React Renderer Dependency.
The new dependency "prism-react-renderer": "^2.4.1" is likely used for code syntax highlighting in documentation or tooling interfaces. As with other similar libraries, verify if it would be better placed under devDependencies based on its usage.

"run_tests": "vitest --coverage",
"start_development_server": "tsx watch ./src/index.ts",
"start_development_server_with_debugger": "tsx watch --inspect=${API_DEBUGGER_HOST:-127.0.0.1}:${API_DEBUGGER_PORT:-9229} ./src/index.ts",
"start_production_server": "pnpm build_production && node ./dist/index.js",
"start_production_server_with_debugger": "pnpm build_production && node --inspect=${API_DEBUGGER_HOST:-127.0.0.1}:${API_DEBUGGER_PORT:-9229} ./dist/index.js",
"upgrade_drizzle_metadata": "drizzle-kit up"
"setup": "tsx setup.ts",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Setup Script Introduced.
The "setup": "tsx setup.ts" script is introduced to streamline the initialization process, likely in regard to setting up the PostgreSQL sample database. Ensure that setup.ts is well-tested and covers the necessary setup procedures.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2025

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

@gurramkarthiknetha
Copy link
Author

@palisadoes @pateldivyesh1323 please add git-ignore label to this pr i will check remaining failing cases

@palisadoes palisadoes added the ignore-sensitive-files-pr The contributor has a legitimate reason for editiing protected files label Feb 6, 2025
@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

I'm going to close this. @gautam-divyanshu got the DB importation working

@palisadoes palisadoes closed this Feb 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ignore-sensitive-files-pr The contributor has a legitimate reason for editiing protected files
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants