Skip to content

Develop postgres #2898

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 25, 2025
Merged

Develop postgres #2898

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 25, 2025

Conversation

tasneemkoushar
Copy link
Contributor

@tasneemkoushar tasneemkoushar commented Jan 25, 2025

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Issue Number:

Fixes #

Snapshots/Videos:

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

Summary

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

Checklist

CodeRabbit AI Review

  • I have reviewed and addressed all critical issues flagged by CodeRabbit AI
  • I have implemented or provided justification for each non-critical suggestion
  • I have documented my reasoning in the PR comments where CodeRabbit AI suggestions were not implemented

Test Coverage

  • I have written tests for all new changes/features
  • I have verified that test coverage meets or exceeds 95%
  • I have run the test suite locally and all tests pass

Other information

Have you read the contributing guide?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated GitHub Actions workflow to use yarn instead of pnpm for package management
    • Simplified deployment configuration
    • Enhanced clarity in the setup of the SSH agent

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 25, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow for deploying the Docusaurus website. Key changes include the addition of a step to enable Corepack and the transition from pnpm to yarn as the package manager. The workflow retains the existing Node.js version specification, while the setup for the SSH agent has been renamed for clarity. The overall structure of the workflow remains unchanged, with no modifications to triggering conditions or job definitions.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/push-deploy-website.yml - Added Corepack enablement step
- Renamed SSH agent setup step for clarity
- Updated package manager commands from pnpm to yarn

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 15f1d83 and ecfe394.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/push-deploy-website.yml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
.github/workflows/push-deploy-website.yml (5)

41-41: Consider pinning the Node.js version for reproducible builds.

Using a floating version ('20.x') could lead to inconsistent builds if Node.js 20.x introduces breaking changes. Consider pinning to a specific version (e.g., '20.11.0').


42-43: Add error handling to Corepack enablement.

The Corepack enablement step should include error handling to ensure the command executes successfully.


44-45: LGTM! Good job on using a pinned version.

The SSH agent setup is well-configured with a pinned version and clear step name.


Line range hint 55-57: Add pre-checks and error handling to deployment steps.

The deployment steps should verify prerequisites and include proper error handling.


Line range hint 57-57: Add newline at end of file.

Add a newline character at the end of the file to comply with YAML best practices.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0131b82 and 15f1d83.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/push-deploy-website.yml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/push-deploy-website.yml

[error] 57-57: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/push-deploy-website.yml (1)

Line range hint 13-14: Verify if "develop-postgres" is the intended target branch.

The workflow is configured to run on push to the "develop-postgres" branch. Please verify if this is intentional or if it should be targeting a different branch (e.g., "develop").

✅ Verification successful

Branch configuration is correct and intentional

The "develop-postgres" branch is a protected branch that exists alongside the "develop" branch, suggesting it's an intentional parallel development track. Multiple workflows consistently target this branch, indicating proper configuration.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if develop-postgres is the default branch or if there are other similar workflows

# Check repository default branch
echo "Checking repository default branch..."
gh api repos/PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api | jq .default_branch

# List all workflow files targeting different branches
echo -e "\nChecking other workflow files..."
find .github/workflows -type f -name "*.yml" -exec sh -c '
  echo "\nFile: {}"
  grep -A 2 "branches:" "{}" || true
' \;

Length of output: 834


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if develop-postgres branch exists and its history
echo "Checking develop-postgres branch..."
gh api repos/PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api/branches/develop-postgres --jq '.name, .protected'

echo -e "\nChecking recent commits on develop-postgres..."
git log develop-postgres --max-count=5 --pretty=format:"%h %s (%cr)" || echo "Branch not found locally"

echo -e "\nChecking if there's a develop branch..."
gh api repos/PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api/branches/develop --jq '.name, .protected' || echo "develop branch not found"

Length of output: 509

@@ -51,5 +54,4 @@ jobs:
git config --global user.email "[email protected]"
git config --global user.name "gh-actions"
yarn install --frozen-lockfile
yarn deploy

yarn deploy
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add newline at end of file.

Add a newline character at the end of the file to comply with YAML best practices.

           yarn deploy
+
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
yarn deploy
yarn deploy
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 57-57: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

Comment on lines 39 to +41
- uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
node-version: '20.x'
- uses: webfactory/[email protected]
node-version: '20.x'
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Consider pinning the Node.js version for reproducible builds.

Using a floating version ('20.x') could lead to inconsistent builds if Node.js 20.x introduces breaking changes. Consider pinning to a specific version (e.g., '20.11.0').

 - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
   with:
-    node-version: '20.x'
+    node-version: '20.11.0'
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
node-version: '20.x'
- uses: webfactory/[email protected]
node-version: '20.x'
- uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
node-version: '20.11.0'

Comment on lines +42 to +43
- name: Enable Corepack
run: corepack enable
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Add error handling to Corepack enablement.

The Corepack enablement step should include error handling to ensure the command executes successfully.

 - name: Enable Corepack
-  run: corepack enable
+  run: |
+    if ! corepack enable; then
+      echo "Failed to enable Corepack"
+      exit 1
+    fi
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- name: Enable Corepack
run: corepack enable
- name: Enable Corepack
run: |
if ! corepack enable; then
echo "Failed to enable Corepack"
exit 1
fi

Comment on lines 56 to 57
yarn install --frozen-lockfile
yarn deploy

yarn deploy
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add pre-checks and error handling to deployment steps.

The deployment steps should verify prerequisites and include proper error handling.

-          yarn install --frozen-lockfile
-          yarn deploy
+          if [ ! -f "yarn.lock" ]; then
+            echo "Error: yarn.lock file not found"
+            exit 1
+          fi
+          
+          echo "Installing dependencies..."
+          if ! yarn install --frozen-lockfile; then
+            echo "Failed to install dependencies"
+            exit 1
+          fi
+          
+          echo "Deploying website..."
+          if ! yarn deploy; then
+            echo "Failed to deploy website"
+            exit 1
+          fi
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
yarn install --frozen-lockfile
yarn deploy
yarn deploy
if [ ! -f "yarn.lock" ]; then
echo "Error: yarn.lock file not found"
exit 1
fi
echo "Installing dependencies..."
if ! yarn install --frozen-lockfile; then
echo "Failed to install dependencies"
exit 1
fi
echo "Deploying website..."
if ! yarn deploy; then
echo "Failed to deploy website"
exit 1
fi
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 57-57: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

@tasneemkoushar tasneemkoushar merged commit 402e69e into PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres Jan 25, 2025
14 of 16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant