Skip to content

fixed loadSampleData.ts and added tests #2804

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

fixed loadSampleData.ts and added tests #2804

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

Shreyas2309
Copy link

@Shreyas2309 Shreyas2309 commented Dec 29, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Fixes: Fixed functionality to load sample data into MongoDB collections and verify document counts.

Issue Number:

Fixes #2796

Did you add tests for your changes?

Yes. Added unit tests to verify the sample data import process and document count verification.

Snapshots/Videos:

image

Summary

This PR fixes the functionality to import sample data into MongoDB collections and verifies document counts post-import. Additionally, test cases are provided to validate this functionality. The motivation behind this change is to ensure that data can be easily loaded and verified in development environments, facilitating better testing and consistency.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No, this PR does not introduce any breaking changes till now.

Other information

This change helps with the automated setup of sample data for testing and development, ensuring that the data is accurately imported and can be verified post-import.

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced sample data loading utility with improved path resolution.
    • Made the listSampleData function exportable for broader accessibility.
  • Tests

    • Implemented a new Vitest test suite to verify sample data document counts.
    • Added database connection management for testing.
  • Chores

    • Updated TypeScript configuration to include Vitest type declarations.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 29, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces enhancements to the sample data loading process within the loadSampleData.ts utility. Key modifications include the addition of the fileURLToPath import for improved path resolution, a change in the dirname calculation, and the exportation of the listSampleData function. Additionally, the method for constructing file paths has been updated to use path.resolve instead of path.join. A new test suite has also been added to validate the sample data import functionality, ensuring robust error handling and verification of document counts.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts - Added fileURLToPath import
- Updated dirname calculation
- Made listSampleData function exportable
- Replaced path.join with path.resolve
tests/utilities/loadSampleData.spec.ts - Added new test suite for sample data import
- Implemented database connection setup/teardown
- Created test to verify document counts after import
tsconfig.json - Added "types": ["vitest"] compiler option

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Resolve incorrect file path resolution [#2796]
Handle cross-platform path issues
Prevent duplicate path prefixes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes
  • DMills27
  • SiddheshKukade

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's tale of paths so bright,
Resolving routes with coding might,
From Windows woes to Unix glee,
Sample data now flows free and key,
Code's journey mapped with pure delight! 🗺️


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 29b5fe3 and 6a38112.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • tsconfig.json

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
tests/utilities/loadSampleData.spec.ts (1)

25-53: Robust test for sample data import.
The test thoroughly verifies multiple collections' document counts. This is excellent for ensuring accurate data loading. Consider adding one more assertion verifying that no extraneous documents exist if your sample data is supposed to remain constant.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3a5276a and 29b5fe3.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts (5 hunks)
  • tests/utilities/loadSampleData.spec.ts (1 hunks)
  • tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
tests/utilities/loadSampleData.spec.ts (2)

1-13: Good organization of imports and model references.
Everything looks well-organized, and referencing models directly from ../../src/models ensures clarity. Make sure that any newly added models are also imported here for future tests.


16-23: Database connection handling is clear and safe.
Using beforeAll and afterAll to connect and disconnect from the database is straightforward and clean. This approach avoids repeated connection overhead in each test.

src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts (5)

3-3: Proper use of fileURLToPath.
This modern approach to define dirname is beneficial for cross-platform compatibility.


20-20: dirname is clearly defined using path.dirname.
This makes the file path handling less error-prone than manually parsing import.meta.url.


31-33: Exporting listSampleData clarifies usage.
Making this function exportable is helpful for test coverage and modular usage. Good job!


46-46: Absolute path resolution for sample data.
Using path.resolve ensures the file path remains correct, even when the execution directory may vary.


115-115: Reading from sample_data using absolute paths.
Keep this approach to avoid potential issues with relative paths in different environments.

tsconfig.json (1)

12-12: Addition of "types": ["vitest"]
Including Vitest types ensures proper type definitions in your test code and helps prevent type-related issues.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Dec 29, 2024
@palisadoes palisadoes added the ignore-sensitive-files-pr The contributor has a legitimate reason for editiing protected files label Dec 29, 2024
@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

Please fix the failing tests

@Shreyas2309
Copy link
Author

Shreyas2309 commented Dec 30, 2024

I noticed that my current pull request has the wrong source branch. Unfortunately, GitHub does not allow changing the source branch of an existing PR. Would it be possible to close this PR and open a new one with the correct source branch ? I’ll ensure that the changes are carried over and everything is in place for the review.

Please let me know if this approach works for you. Thanks for your understanding!

@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

This PR needs to be closed.

The source and target PR branches are the same. This means that our reviewers will not be able to checkout the changes and test on their systems using this methodology which will cause a rejection error:

https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally

Please follow these steps:

  1. Create a new branch with a different name in your local repository
    1. Make sure the branch name is named differently from the required target branch in the PR
    2. Use the git checkout -b command to do this.
  2. Resubmit your PR

Closing

@palisadoes palisadoes closed this Dec 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ignore-sensitive-files-pr The contributor has a legitimate reason for editiing protected files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants