Updating the Pull Request Template to Enforce Standards #2692
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the pull request template located in Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/pull_request_template.md (2)
50-52: Add reference to where CodeRabbit AI suggestions can be foundThe checklist items are clear, but it would be helpful to add a note about where contributors can find the CodeRabbit AI suggestions (e.g., in PR comments).
**CodeRabbit AI Review** +> Note: CodeRabbit AI suggestions can be found in the pull request comments. - [ ] I have reviewed and addressed all CodeRabbit AI suggestions - [ ] I have explained any cases where CodeRabbit AI suggestions were not implemented🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
50-50: null
Emphasis used instead of a heading(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
54-57: Add guidance for verifying test coverageThe test coverage checklist is comprehensive, but it would be helpful to provide instructions on how contributors can verify their test coverage percentage.
**Test Coverage** +> To verify test coverage: +> 1. Run `npm test -- --coverage` (or equivalent command for your test framework) +> 2. Check the coverage report in the console output - [ ] I have written tests for all new changes/features - [ ] I have verified that test coverage meets or exceeds 90-95% - [ ] I have run the test suite locally and all tests pass🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
54-54: null
Emphasis used instead of a heading(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/pull_request_template.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint
.github/pull_request_template.md
48-48: null
Emphasis used instead of a heading
(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
50-50: null
Emphasis used instead of a heading
(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
54-54: null
Emphasis used instead of a heading
(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/pull_request_template.md (1)
48-58: LGTM! The template changes effectively enforce standards
The new checklist sections successfully address the PR objectives by:
- Ensuring accountability for CodeRabbit AI suggestions
- Enforcing test coverage standards
- Promoting quality through verification steps
The suggested refinements above will further enhance clarity and maintainability.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
48-48: null
Emphasis used instead of a heading
(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
50-50: null
Emphasis used instead of a heading
(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
54-54: null
Emphasis used instead of a heading
(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
||
| ### Test Coverage | ||
| - [ ] I have written tests for all new changes/features | ||
| - [ ] I have verified that test coverage meets or exceeds 90-95% |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| - [ ] I have verified that test coverage meets or exceeds 90-95% | |
| - [ ] I have verified that test coverage meets or exceeds 95% |
varshith257
added
the
ignore-sensitive-files-pr
|
I suggest to create new local branch with upstream/develop and submit changes. Can you submit new PR for the same? |
|
Yeah I will make changes and create a new PR. Do I have to close this PR? @varshith257 |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
feature
Issue Number:
Fixes #2689
Did you add tests for your changes?
No
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
No
Summary
The
pull_request_template.mdfile now contains new added check list forDoes this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Other information
Currently the PR is created for the develop branch, working for the
develop-postgresbranch template as well.Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit