-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
AMM-1225 Query change required for different demographic details #85
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request updates the beneficiary mapping retrieval by modifying the Changes
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? πͺ§ TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
π§Ή Nitpick comments (2)
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/identity/service/IdentityService.java (2)
96-104
: Remove unused EntityManager injection.The EntityManager is injected but not used in any method. Either:
- Remove the unused injection, or
- Document the intended future use with a TODO comment
Apply this diff to remove the unused injection:
-import jakarta.persistence.EntityManager; -import jakarta.persistence.criteria.CriteriaBuilder; -import jakarta.persistence.criteria.CriteriaQuery; -import jakarta.persistence.criteria.Join; -import jakarta.persistence.criteria.JoinType; -import jakarta.persistence.criteria.Predicate; -import jakarta.persistence.criteria.Root; -@Autowired -private EntityManager entityManager;Or add a TODO comment explaining the intended use:
@Autowired private EntityManager entityManager; +// TODO: Implement dynamic queries using JPA Criteria API for complex search operations
Also applies to: 113-114
62-62
: Remove unused import.The
TBendataaccess
class is imported but not used in the code.Apply this diff to remove the unused import:
-import com.iemr.common.identity.domain.TBendataaccess;
π Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
π Files selected for processing (2)
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/identity/repo/BenMappingRepo.java
(1 hunks)src/main/java/com/iemr/common/identity/service/IdentityService.java
(3 hunks)
β° Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (java)
- GitHub Check: Build_and_analyse
π Additional comments (1)
src/main/java/com/iemr/common/identity/repo/BenMappingRepo.java (1)
127-137
:β Verification inconclusive
Verify join conditions for data consistency.
The join conditions use a mix of direct ID matches and vanSerialNo matches. Ensure that:
- The vanSerialNo values are consistent across tables
- The vanID matches maintain data integrity
- The LEFT JOINs don't unintentionally exclude records
Run the following script to check for potential data inconsistencies:
π Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for data inconsistencies in join conditions echo "Checking for mismatched vanSerialNo values..." mysql -e " SELECT 'Mismatched vanSerialNo' as Issue, COUNT(*) as Count FROM MBeneficiarymapping bm LEFT JOIN MBeneficiaryregidmapping brm ON brm.benRegId = bm.benRegId AND brm.vanID = bm.vanID WHERE brm.benRegId IS NULL UNION ALL SELECT 'Mismatched vanID', COUNT(*) FROM MBeneficiarymapping bm LEFT JOIN MBeneficiaryregidmapping brm ON brm.benRegId = bm.benRegId AND brm.vanID = bm.vanID WHERE brm.vanID IS NULL; "Length of output: 647
Manual Verification Needed for JOIN Conditions
The automated check using the provided MySQL script encountered a "mysql: command not found" error, so please manually verify that:
- The join conditions correctly compare the correct identifier types (direct IDs versus vanSerialNo) across the tables.
- The consistency of
vanSerialNo
values and the integrity ofvanID
relationships is maintained.- The LEFT JOINs are structured so that no essential records are unexpectedly excluded.
//@Query("SELECT t FROM MBeneficiarymapping t WHERE t.vanSerialNo =:vanSerialNo AND t.vanID=:vanID") | ||
@Query(value = "select bm FROM MBeneficiarymapping bm " | ||
+"LEFT JOIN MBeneficiaryregidmapping brm ON brm.benRegId=bm.benRegId and brm.vanID=bm.vanID " | ||
+"LEFT JOIN MBeneficiarycontact bc ON bc.vanSerialNo = bm.benContactsId and bm.vanID=bc.vanID " | ||
+"LEFT JOIN MBeneficiarydetail bd on bm.benDetailsId = bd.vanSerialNo and bm.vanID=bd.vanID " | ||
+"LEFT JOIN MBeneficiaryaddress ba ON ba.vanSerialNo = bm.benAddressId and bm.vanID=ba.vanID " | ||
+"LEFT JOIN MBeneficiaryconsent bt on bt.vanSerialNo=bm.benConsentId and bm.vanID=bt.vanID " | ||
//+"LEFT JOIN MBensecurestack bs on bs.benSecureStackId=bm.benSecureStackId and bm.vanID=bs.vanID " | ||
+"LEFT JOIN MBeneficiaryImage bi on bi.vanSerialNo=bm.benImageId and bm.vanID=bi.vanID " | ||
+"LEFT JOIN MBeneficiaryAccount bac on bac.vanSerialNo=bm.benAccountID and bm.vanID=bac.vanID " | ||
+"LEFT JOIN MBeneficiaryidentity bid on bid.vanSerialNo=bm.benMapId and bm.vanID=bid.vanID " | ||
+"LEFT JOIN MBeneficiaryfamilymapping bfm on bfm.vanSerialNo=bm.benMapId and bm.vanID=bfm.vanID " | ||
+"LEFT JOIN MBeneficiaryservicemapping bsm on bsm.vanSerialNo=bm.benMapId and bm.vanID=bsm.vanID " | ||
+"where bm.vanSerialNo=:vanSerialNo and bm.vanID=:vanID") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
π οΈ Refactor suggestion
β Verification inconclusive
Consider performance implications of the complex query.
The query joins 10 tables which could impact performance, especially with large datasets. Consider the following improvements:
- Add appropriate indexes on join columns (vanID, vanSerialNo) in all tables
- Implement pagination to limit result set size
- Consider splitting into multiple queries if not all data is always needed
Run the following script to check if indexes exist on the join columns:
π Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for missing indexes on join columns
# Note: This assumes MySQL/MariaDB. Adjust for other databases.
echo "Checking indexes on join columns..."
mysql -e "
SELECT DISTINCT
CONCAT(TABLE_NAME, '.', COLUMN_NAME) as 'Table.Column',
CASE WHEN INDEX_NAME IS NULL THEN 'Missing Index' ELSE 'Has Index' END as 'Index Status'
FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS c
LEFT JOIN INFORMATION_SCHEMA.STATISTICS s
ON c.TABLE_NAME = s.TABLE_NAME
AND c.COLUMN_NAME = s.COLUMN_NAME
WHERE c.TABLE_SCHEMA = 'your_db_name'
AND c.TABLE_NAME IN (
'MBeneficiaryregidmapping',
'MBeneficiarycontact',
'MBeneficiarydetail',
'MBeneficiaryaddress',
'MBeneficiaryconsent',
'MBeneficiaryImage',
'MBeneficiaryAccount',
'MBeneficiaryidentity',
'MBeneficiaryfamilymapping',
'MBeneficiaryservicemapping'
)
AND c.COLUMN_NAME IN ('vanID', 'vanSerialNo')
ORDER BY 2 DESC, 1;
"
Length of output: 1030
Attention: Performance Considerations & Index Verification Needed
This query now performs complex LEFT JOINs across 10 related tables, which could significantly affect performance on large datasets. Please address the following:
- Index Validation: Ensure that proper indexes exist on the join columns (
vanID
,vanSerialNo
) in all involved tables. Our automated index check did not produce output (mysql command not found), so please manually verify that these indexes are in place. - Pagination: Consider adding pagination to limit the result set size if all joined data isn't required at once.
- N+1 Query Risk: Review the data fetching design for potential N+1 query issues when accessing related entities.
- Join Conditions: Confirm that all join conditions (especially the vanID criteria) consistently maintain data integrity.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ravishanigarapu please confirm this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@coderabbitai yes we have already created indexes for the all the tables.Fetching data based on filterations.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ravishanigarapu Thank you for confirming. With proper indexes in place and filtered data retrieval, the query's performance should be well-optimized.
βοΈ Learnings added
Learnt from: ravishanigarapu
PR: PSMRI/Identity-API#85
File: src/main/java/com/iemr/common/identity/repo/BenMappingRepo.java:125-138
Timestamp: 2025-02-17T07:29:04.989Z
Learning: In the Identity-API project, tables involved in beneficiary mapping queries (MBeneficiaryregidmapping, MBeneficiarycontact, MBeneficiarydetail, MBeneficiaryaddress, MBeneficiaryconsent, MBeneficiaryImage, MBeneficiaryAccount, MBeneficiaryidentity, MBeneficiaryfamilymapping, MBeneficiaryservicemapping) have indexes created on join columns (vanID, vanSerialNo) to optimize query performance.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
If you found this review helpful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X?
Thank you for using CodeRabbit!
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
π§Ή Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/package.yml (1)
45-45
: Update Artifact Upload Action and Remove Trailing SpacesThe upgrade to
actions/upload-artifact@v4
is a positive change that ensures the workflow uses the latest features and improvements in the artifact upload process. However, YAMLlint has flagged trailing spaces on this line. Please remove the extra spaces at the end of the line to comply with best practices and avoid potential parsing issues.- uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4 + uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4π§° Tools
πͺ YAMLlint (1.35.1)
[error] 45-45: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
π Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
π Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/package.yml
(1 hunks)
π§° Additional context used
πͺ YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/package.yml
[error] 45-45: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
β° Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (java)
- GitHub Check: Build_and_analyse
Implemented Commit Message Linting and Automation for TM-API
Implement Commit Message Linting and Automation for TM-API PSMRI#85
π Description
JIRA ID: AMM-1225
Please provide a summary of the change and the motivation behind it. Include relevant context and details.
β Type of Change
βΉοΈ Additional Information
Please describe how the changes were tested, and include any relevant screenshots, logs, or other information that provides additional context.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores