Skip to content

chore: bump duckdb from 0.7.1 to 0.8.0 #2754

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 12, 2023

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jun 7, 2023

Bumps duckdb from 0.7.1 to 0.8.0.

Release notes

Sourced from duckdb's releases.

v0.8.0

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: duckdb/duckdb-rs@v0.7.1...v0.8.0

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@github-actions github-actions bot enabled auto-merge (squash) June 7, 2023 06:07
@max-sixty
Copy link
Member

ref #2752

Bumps [duckdb](https://github.com/wangfenjin/duckdb-rs) from 0.7.1 to 0.8.0.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/wangfenjin/duckdb-rs/releases)
- [Commits](duckdb/duckdb-rs@v0.7.1...v0.8.0)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: duckdb
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@dependabot dependabot bot force-pushed the dependabot/cargo/duckdb-0.8.0 branch from 0a569d4 to e41c60c Compare June 12, 2023 01:47
@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit db35006 into main Jun 12, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the dependabot/cargo/duckdb-0.8.0 branch June 12, 2023 02:18
@eitsupi
Copy link
Member

eitsupi commented Jun 12, 2023

I am surprised that DuckDB 0.8 was able to pass the test. Was this expected?

@max-sixty
Copy link
Member

I am surprised that DuckDB 0.8 was able to pass the test. Was this expected?

Ummm, no, how did that happen :)

@max-sixty
Copy link
Member

The main reason we didn't merge was because it broke our tests. But it's very weird that it now doesn't break our tests!

I checked that at least the tests fail when the result is changed, so the tests are still working

@max-sixty
Copy link
Member

The commit at #2601 also passes, actually

@max-sixty
Copy link
Member

8b24303 fails, as expected. I couldn't see the different at first glance. It does seem like tests are running — changing a snapshot does make it break. So it's unclear what's going on...

max-sixty added a commit to max-sixty/prql that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2023
As part of debugging PRQL#2754, there are a few places the test can return early etc. While they're not the cause of the issue, it's worth removing them anyway
@max-sixty
Copy link
Member

OK, so this is amusing — I don't think there was ever an issue about sorting and nulls. The sort column in the relevant query doesn't have any nulls. So all of that discussion was just LARPing...

The reason the test now passes is because in #2684, we changed the query to the one that works with duckdb 0.8.0. So I'm guessing this was something to do with that.

(Though I'm not 100% sure about this — I implement NULLS LAST and IIRC that fixed the tests?)

Regardless, I'm signing off for the eve. I don't think the nulls issue is urgent any longer. And it's a good reminder to ensure the thing we're working on is actually solving the relevant problem.

@aljazerzen
Copy link
Member

Hahaha, we were solving a real issue, but the cause was something completely unrelated :D

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants